120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163345)
21. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis.
Petrosian A; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2273-88. PubMed ID: 15551553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Ge J; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2574-85. PubMed ID: 16898462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. SVM based system for classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Singh S; Kumar V; Verma HK; Singh D
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4747-50. PubMed ID: 17945853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms.
Radovic M; Milosevic M; Ninkovic S; Filipovic N; Peulic A
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(6):757-74. PubMed ID: 26409521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automatic detection of the breast border and nipple position on digital mammograms using genetic algorithm for asymmetry approach to detection of microcalcifications.
Karnan M; Thangavel K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17543415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Novel Internet of Things Framework Integrated with Real Time Monitoring for Intelligent Healthcare Environment.
Suresh A; Udendhran R; Balamurgan M; Varatharajan R
J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(6):165. PubMed ID: 31053963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microcalcification detection in full-field digital mammograms: A fully automated computer-aided system.
Basile TMA; Fanizzi A; Losurdo L; Bellotti R; Bottigli U; Dentamaro R; Didonna V; Fausto A; Massafra R; Moschetta M; Tamborra P; Tangaro S; La Forgia D
Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():1-9. PubMed ID: 31515007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computerized identification of suspicious regions for masses in digitized mammograms.
Chang YH; Zheng B; Gur D
Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 8675422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection.
Nunes FL; Schiabel H; Goes CE
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 16820957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A fuzzy approach for contrast enhancement of mammography breast images.
Sahba F; Venetsanopoulos A
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():619-26. PubMed ID: 20865547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammographic images segmentation using texture descriptors.
Mascaro AA; Mello CA; Santos WP; Cavalcanti GD
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3653-6. PubMed ID: 19964312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
