These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163547)

  • 1. Quantifying the causal interactions in the brain using a measure of directed transinformation.
    Raza RH; Aviyente S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3828-31. PubMed ID: 19163547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Directed information measure for quantifying the information flow in the brain.
    Liu Y; Aviyente S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2188-91. PubMed ID: 19965149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of effective connectivity in the brain using a measure of directed information.
    Liu Y; Aviyente S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():635103. PubMed ID: 22675401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear effective connectivity measure based on adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System and Granger Causality.
    Farokhzadi M; Hossein-Zadeh GA; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():382-394. PubMed ID: 30010006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of direct nonlinear effective connectivity using information theory and multilayer perceptron.
    Khadem A; Hossein-Zadeh GA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():53-67. PubMed ID: 24751646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A nonlinear causality measure in the frequency domain: nonlinear partial directed coherence with applications to EEG.
    He F; Billings SA; Wei HL; Sarrigiannis PG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Mar; 225():71-80. PubMed ID: 24472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing directed information as a method for inferring functional connectivity in neural ensembles.
    So K; Gastpar M; Carmena JM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7324-7. PubMed ID: 22256030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes.
    Blinowska KJ; Kuś R; Kamiński M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Nov; 70(5 Pt 1):050902. PubMed ID: 15600583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of multivariate causality based measures of effective connectivity.
    Wu MH; Frye RE; Zouridakis G
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Dec; 41(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 21742321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canonical Granger causality between regions of interest.
    Ashrafulla S; Haldar JP; Joshi AA; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():189-99. PubMed ID: 23811410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bypassing the volume conduction effect by multilayer neural network for effective connectivity estimation.
    Talebi N; Nasrabadi AM; Mohammad-Rezazadeh I
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Sep; 57(9):1947-1959. PubMed ID: 31273576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using phase shift Granger causality to measure directed connectivity in EEG recordings.
    Marshall WJ; Lackner CL; Marriott P; Santesso DL; Segalowitz SJ
    Brain Connect; 2014 Dec; 4(10):826-41. PubMed ID: 25392086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting causal interdependence in simulated neural signals based on pairwise and multivariate analysis.
    Yang C; Le Bouquin Jeannes R; Faucon G; Wendling F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():162-5. PubMed ID: 21096528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kernel canonical-correlation Granger causality for multiple time series.
    Wu G; Duan X; Liao W; Gao Q; Chen H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Apr; 83(4 Pt 1):041921. PubMed ID: 21599214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying Granger causal relationships between neural power dynamics and variables of interest.
    Winkler I; Haufe S; Porbadnigk AK; Müller KR; Dähne S
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():489-504. PubMed ID: 25554431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality.
    Marinazzo D; Liao W; Chen H; Stramaglia S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 20132895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-varying linear and nonlinear parametric model for Granger causality analysis.
    Li Y; Wei HL; Billings SA; Liao XF
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Apr; 85(4 Pt 1):041906. PubMed ID: 22680497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate autoregressive modeling and granger causality analysis of multiple spike trains.
    Krumin M; Shoham S
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2010; 2010():752428. PubMed ID: 20454705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of neural dynamic coupling and causal interactions between independent EEG components from cognitive tasks using linear and nonlinear methods.
    Sakkalis V; Tsiaras V; Michalopoulos K; Zervakis M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3767-70. PubMed ID: 19163531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatio-temporal Granger causality: a new framework.
    Luo Q; Lu W; Cheng W; Valdes-Sosa PA; Wen X; Ding M; Feng J
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():241-63. PubMed ID: 23643924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.