These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163773)

  • 1. A novel VOCODER for cochlear implants.
    Johnson PA; McNamara DM; Ziarani AK
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4732-5. PubMed ID: 19163773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2417-26. PubMed ID: 16642854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandarin speech-in-noise and tone recognition using vocoder simulations of the temporal limits encoder for cochlear implants.
    Meng Q; Zheng N; Li X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):301-10. PubMed ID: 26827026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandarin Chinese tone identification in cochlear implants: predictions from acoustic models.
    Morton KD; Torrione PA; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):66-76. PubMed ID: 18706497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech encoding in the auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implants.
    Sachs MB; Young ED; Miller MI
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():94-113. PubMed ID: 6575675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):427-34. PubMed ID: 20058988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3981-90. PubMed ID: 21682419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on the effect of spectral details encoding in speech processing on Mandarin recognition for cochlear implants users with speech maskers].
    Guan T; Xu T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18610637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Speech coding strategy based on amplitude and frequency modulation for cochlear implants].
    Lin H; Wang W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 28(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 21604474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An adaptive method for tracking voicing irregularities.
    Qi Y; Shipp T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3471-7. PubMed ID: 1535639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants.
    Loizou PC
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():109-143. PubMed ID: 16891839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchrony capture filterbank: auditory-inspired signal processing for tracking individual frequency components in speech.
    Kumaresan R; Peddinti VK; Cariani P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4290-310. PubMed ID: 23742379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.