116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163784)
1. Study of a mammographic CAD performance dependence on the considered mammogram set.
Garcia-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Gonzalez-Velasco HM; Garcia-Manso A; Macias-Macias M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4776-9. PubMed ID: 19163784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.
Wang X; Li L; Liu W; Xu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):570-9. PubMed ID: 22234836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Needs assessment for next generation computer-aided mammography reference image databases and evaluation studies.
Horsch A; Hapfelmeier A; Elter M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Nov; 6(6):749-67. PubMed ID: 21448711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Information-theoretic CAD system in mammography: entropy-based indexing for computational efficiency and robust performance.
Tourassi GD; Harrawood B; Singh S; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3193-204. PubMed ID: 17879782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probabilistic framework for reliability analysis of information-theoretic CAD systems in mammography.
Habas PA; Zurada JM; Elmaghraby AS; Tourassi GD
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():6113-6. PubMed ID: 17946741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography.
Sampat MP; Bovik AC; Whitman GJ; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2110-23. PubMed ID: 18561687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving a CAD system using bilateral information.
Tortajada M; Oliver A; Díez Y; Martí R; Vilanova JC; Freixenet J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5054-7. PubMed ID: 21096025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
