These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19164116)

  • 1. Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.
    Venkatesan A; Chu P; Kerlikowske K; Sickles EA; Smith-Bindman R
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):648-57. PubMed ID: 19164116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
    Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
    Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic features of screening detected pT1 (a-b) invasive breast cancer using BI-RADS lexicon.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Velasco M; del Amo M; Arguis P; Burrel M; Capurro S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2620-6. PubMed ID: 22206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):471-5. PubMed ID: 9680578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8667537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy.
    Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1339-45. PubMed ID: 26587943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
    Kuzmiak CM; Dancel R; Pisano E; Zeng D; Cole E; Koomen MA; McLelland R
    Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 16627203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic features of benign breast lesions and risk of subsequent breast cancer in women attending breast cancer screening.
    Posso M; Alcántara R; Vázquez I; Comerma L; Baré M; Louro J; Quintana MJ; Román M; Marcos-Gragera R; Vernet-Tomas M; Saladie F; Vidal C; Bargalló X; Peñalva L; Sala M; Castells X;
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):621-629. PubMed ID: 34156554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type.
    Onega T; Smith M; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Rosenberg RD; Smith RA; Sickles EA; Haneuse S; Anderson ML; Yankaskas B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(11):788-94. PubMed ID: 23122345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer risk prediction model: a nomogram based on common mammographic screening findings.
    Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; IntHout J; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2413-9. PubMed ID: 23591619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of Screening Recall Behavior Among Subspecialty Breast Radiologists.
    Giess CS; Ip IK; Licaros A; Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Lacson R; Khorasani R
    Acad Radiol; 2023 May; 30(5):798-806. PubMed ID: 35803888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.
    Thurfjell MG
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001 Dec; 42(424):1-22. PubMed ID: 12040855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Lipasti S; Anttila A; Pamilo M
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 20429762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas.
    Seo BK; Pisano ED; Kuzimak CM; Koomen M; Pavic D; Lee Y; Cole EB; Lee J
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8. PubMed ID: 16979070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1-9 mm invasive breast cancers. worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone.
    Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Lindgren A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2001 May; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11519866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.