These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1916431)

  • 1. [Value of echotomographic measurement of the diameter of the head and abdomen and the length of the femur in the determination of body mass in neonates].
    Stanković A
    Glas Srp Akad Nauka Med; 1991; (40):71-6. PubMed ID: 1916431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; Bors-Koefoed R; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 3618691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charts of fetal biometries at Sukhothai Hospital.
    Kankeow K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):844-51. PubMed ID: 17596035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements.
    Hadlock FP; Harrist RB; Carpenter RJ; Deter RL; Park SK
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):535-40. PubMed ID: 6691115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea.
    Amoa AB; Wapi J; Klufio CA
    P N G Med J; 1993 Sep; 36(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 8059548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound femur length as a means of assessing gestational age amongst Nigerians.
    Osinusi BO
    West Afr J Med; 1990; 9(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 2268565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of second trimester biometry in singleton and twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive techniques.
    Gardosi J; Mul T; Francis A; Hall J; Fishel S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jun; 104(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 9197881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ultrasonic measurements of fetal thigh soft tissue thickness in the estimation of fetal weight].
    Han Y; Lin H; Liu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 33(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 10682438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal measurement of fetal thigh soft tissue parameters and its role in the prediction of birth weight.
    O'Connor C; Farah N; O'Higgins A; Segurado R; Fitzpatrick C; Turner MJ; Stuart B; Kennelly MM
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Oct; 33(10):945-51. PubMed ID: 23716034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.
    Warsof SL; Wolf P; Coulehan J; Queenan JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 3515257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound-comparison of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL).
    Hsieh FJ; Chang FM; Huang HC; Lu CC; Ko TM; Chen HY
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1987 Sep; 86(9):957-64. PubMed ID: 3320270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of femur length measured by ultrasonography to predict fetal maturity.
    Tahilramaney MP; Platt LD; Golde SH
    J Perinatol; 1991 Jun; 11(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 1890476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonography and fetal growth: key perinatal factors.
    Falkner F
    J Perinatol; 1995; 15(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 7595768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal standards for fetal biometry: to each measurement its fitting model.
    Pineau JC; Thiebaugeorges O; Guihard-Costa AM
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 16757919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500-1000 g).
    Medchill MT; Peterson CM; Kreinick C; Garbaciak J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 78(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 2067777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: a new predictive model incorporating femur length for the low-birth-weight fetus.
    Roberts AB; Lee AJ; James AG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1985 Oct; 13(8):555-9. PubMed ID: 3934218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels.
    Siemer J; Egger N; Hart N; Meurer B; Müller A; Dathe O; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17602369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound measurements of the fetus.
    Campogrande M; Todros T; Brizzolara M
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1977 Mar; 84(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 843491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.