These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19164325)

  • 1. Prediction of the severity and outcome of acute tubular necrosis based on continuity of Doppler spectrum in the early period after kidney transplantation.
    Kolonko A; Chudek J; Wiecek A
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 May; 24(5):1631-5. PubMed ID: 19164325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of renal transplant scintigraphy with renal resistance index for prediction of early graft dysfunction and evaluation of acute tubular necrosis and acute rejection.
    Yazici B; Yazici A; Oral A; Akgün A; Toz H
    Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Dec; 38(12):931-5. PubMed ID: 24152633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power doppler sonography in early renal transplantation: does it differentiate acute graft rejection from acute tubular necrosis?
    Shebel HM; Akl A; Dawood A; El-Diasty TA; Shokeir AA; Ghoneim MA
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2014 Jul; 25(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 24969181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved diagnosis of early kidney allograft dysfunction by ultrasound with echo enhancer--a new method for the diagnosis of renal perfusion.
    Fischer T; Filimonow S; Dieckhöfer J; Slowinski T; Mühler M; Lembcke A; Budde K; Neumayer HH; Ebeling V; Giessing M; Thomas A; Morgera S
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2921-9. PubMed ID: 16822787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction using color Doppler sonography.
    Johnson CP; Foley WD; Gallagher-Lepak S; Roza AM; Adams MB
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Oct; 173(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 1925897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Renal allografts: prospective analysis of Doppler sonography.
    Allen KS; Jorkasky DK; Arger PH; Velchik MG; Grumbach K; Coleman BG; Mintz MC; Betsch SE; Perloff LJ
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 3051114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation.
    Sharma AK; Tolani SL; Rathi GL; Sharma P; Gupta H; Gupta R
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 Mar; 21(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 20228507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of resistive index measurement in diagnosis of acute rejection episodes following successful kidney transplantation.
    Mehrsai A; Salem S; Ahmadi H; Baradaran N; Taherimahmoudi M; Nikoobakht MR; Rezaeidanesh M; Mansoori D; Pourmand G
    Transplant Proc; 2009 Sep; 41(7):2805-7. PubMed ID: 19765440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reversed diastolic blood flow at duplex Doppler. A sign of poor prognosis in renal transplants.
    Saarinen O; Salmela K; Ahonen J; Edgren J
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jan; 35(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 8305265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Pulsed Doppler ultrasonography in the month following renal transplantation].
    Kalboussi-Touzi C; Cochat P; Poix D; Ecochard R; Martin X
    Pediatrie; 1993; 48(10):735-8. PubMed ID: 8015875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. OKT3 prophylaxis in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function.
    Cohen DJ; Benvenisty AI; Cianci J; Hardy MA
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1989 Nov; 14(5 Suppl 2):19-27. PubMed ID: 2510507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Acute tubular necrosis in kidney transplantation].
    Ounissi M; Gargah T; Barbouch S; Boubaker K; Cherif M; Bacha MM; Abderrahim E; Ben Hamida F; Lakhoua R; Ben Abdallah T; Kheder A
    Tunis Med; 2012 Jun; 90(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 22693087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic value of resistive index of renal transplants in the early postoperative period.
    Saarinen O
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 2031803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and in monitoring the effect of treatment.
    Rasmussen K; Pedersen E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1990 Feb; 50(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 2180059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis.
    Genkins SM; Sanfilippo FP; Carroll BA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):535-9. PubMed ID: 2644778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of renal allograft dysfunction with color Doppler flow ultrasound.
    Lee SK; Wang ML; Su YG; Shen WC; Ho YJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Apr; 51(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 8481843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation.
    Rigsby CM; Burns PN; Weltin GG; Chen B; Bia M; Taylor KJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):39-42. PubMed ID: 3538151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of early kidney resistance index on kidney graft and patient survival during a 5-year follow-up.
    Kolonko A; Chudek J; Zejda JE; Wiecek A
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2012 Mar; 27(3):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21813827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced sonography in early kidney graft dysfunction.
    Benozzi L; Cappelli G; Granito M; Davoli D; Favali D; Montecchi MG; Grossi A; Torricelli P; Albertazzi A
    Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1214-5. PubMed ID: 19460520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A role for extrarenal cells in the regeneration following acute renal failure.
    Gupta S; Verfaillie C; Chmielewski D; Kim Y; Rosenberg ME
    Kidney Int; 2002 Oct; 62(4):1285-90. PubMed ID: 12234298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.