These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19164440)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Babiarz LS; Romero JM; Murphy EK; Brobeck B; Schaefer PW; González RG; Lev MH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Apr; 30(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 19164440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
    Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Debrey SM; Yu H; Lynch JK; Lövblad KO; Wright VL; Janket SJ; Baird AE
    Stroke; 2008 Aug; 39(8):2237-48. PubMed ID: 18556586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Runck F; Steiner RP; Bautz WA; Lell MM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1736-42. PubMed ID: 18635618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography].
    Yasuda E; Miyati T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 21532247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
    Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques.
    Sardanelli F; Zandrino F; Parodi RC; De Caro G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 10096327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis.
    Mitra D; Connolly D; Jenkins S; English P; Birchall D; Mandel C; Shrikanth K; Gregson B; Gholkar A
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):201-7. PubMed ID: 16498031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved carotid lumen delineation on non-contrast MR angiography using SNAP (Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage) imaging.
    Liu H; Sun J; Hippe DS; Wu W; Chu B; Balu N; Hatsukami T; Yuan C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():87-93. PubMed ID: 31247251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast material-enhanced MRA overestimates severity of carotid stenosis, compared with 3D time-of-flight MRA.
    Townsend TC; Saloner D; Pan XM; Rapp JH
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 38(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 12844086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection.
    Vertinsky AT; Schwartz NE; Fischbein NJ; Rosenberg J; Albers GW; Zaharchuk G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1753-60. PubMed ID: 18635617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries with the blood pool agent Vasovist: initial results in comparison to intra-arterial DSA].
    Vogt FM; Herborn CU; Parsons EC; Kröger K; Barkhausen J; Goyen M
    Rofo; 2007 Apr; 179(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 17385136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography].
    Barbier C; Lefèvre F; Bui P; Denny P; Aiouaz C; Becker S
    J Radiol; 2001 Mar; 82(3 Pt 1):245-9. PubMed ID: 11287855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.