These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1916493)

  • 1. Appropriateness of cholecystectomy in the United Kingdom--a consensus panel approach.
    Scott EA; Black N
    Gut; 1991 Sep; 32(9):1066-70. PubMed ID: 1916493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings.
    Fraser GM; Pilpel D; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1994 Sep; 6(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 7795961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appropriateness of cholecystectomy: the public and private sectors compared.
    Scott EA; Black N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Jul; 74(4 Suppl):97-101. PubMed ID: 1416696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications for cholecystectomy: the results of a consensus panel approach.
    Fraser GM; Pilpel D; Hollis S; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1993 Mar; 5(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8457691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK.
    Brook RH; Kosecoff JB; Park RE; Chassin MR; Winslow CM; Hampton JR
    Lancet; 1988 Apr; 1(8588):750-3. PubMed ID: 2895272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the Appropriateness of Off-Label Antipsychotic Use for Mental Health Indications in a Veteran Population.
    Painter JT; Owen R; Henderson KL; Bauer MS; Mittal D; Hudson TJ
    Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Apr; 37(4):438-446. PubMed ID: 28164355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.
    Quintana JM; Cabriada J; de Tejada I; Varona M; Oribe V; Barrios B; Aróstegui I; Bilbao A
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Dec; 11(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 12468691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography--do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other?
    Ayanian JZ; Landrum MB; Normand SL; Guadagnoli E; McNeil BJ
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jun; 338(26):1896-904. PubMed ID: 9637811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition.
    Leape LL; Park RE; Kahan JP; Brook RH
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Jun; 4(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 1511149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography.
    Carbonaro S; Villines TC; Hausleiter J; Devine PJ; Gerber TC; Taylor AJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 19577209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ERCP and sphincterotomy in the context of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: academic and community practice patterns and results.
    Davis WZ; Cotton PB; Arias R; Williams D; Onken JE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Apr; 92(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 9128306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.
    Coulter I; Adams A; Shekelle P
    Health Serv Res; 1995 Oct; 30(4):577-91. PubMed ID: 7591782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does consensus exist in expert panels?
    Scott EA; Black N
    J Public Health Med; 1991 Feb; 13(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 2029435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current practice and opinions regarding the use of oropharyngeal throat packs in the United Kingdom.
    Bisase B; Matthews NS; Lan C
    J Patient Saf; 2011 Sep; 7(3):162-164. PubMed ID: 21857235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of projected complication rates on estimated appropriate use rates for carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness Project Investigators. Academic Medical Center Consortium.
    Matchar DB; Oddone EZ; McCrory DC; Goldstein LB; Landsman PB; Samsa G; Brook RH; Kamberg C; Hilborne L; Leape L; Horner R
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Aug; 32(3):325-42. PubMed ID: 9240284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fictional doctors do us no favours.
    Haslam D
    Practitioner; 2012 Sep; 256(1754):35. PubMed ID: 23252136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between perceived institutional support, job enjoyment, and intentions to work in the United Kingdom: national questionnaire survey of first year doctors.
    Lachish S; Goldacre MJ; Lambert T
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 May; 16():151. PubMed ID: 27215320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary angiography and revascularization: defining procedural indications through formal group processes. The Canadian Revascularization Panel, the Canadian Coronary Angiography Panel.
    Naylor CD; McGlynn EA; Leape LL; Pinfold SP; Bernstein SJ; Hilborne LH; Park RE; Kahan JP; Brook RH
    Can J Cardiol; 1994; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 8111670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional differences in appropriateness of cholecystectomy in a prepaid health insurance system.
    Pilpel D; Fraser GM; Kosecoff J; Weitzman S; Brook RH
    Public Health Rev; 1992-1993; 20(1-2):61-74. PubMed ID: 1305979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routine surgical follow up: do surgeons agree?
    Waghorn A; Thompson J; McKee M
    BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7016):1344-5. PubMed ID: 7496286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.