These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The perceived bulbar redness of clinical grading scales. Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):E1250-8. PubMed ID: 19770812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective quantification of fluorescence intensity on the corneal surface using a modified slit-lamp technique. Tan B; Zhou Y; Svitova T; Lin MC Eye Contact Lens; 2013 May; 39(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 23629006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. Wolffsohn JS; Purslow C Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2003 Mar; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16303494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales. Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 18385056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated measurement of bulbar redness. Fieguth P; Simpson T Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 11818375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of validated bulbar redness grading scales. Schulze MM; Jones DA; Simpson TL Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):976-83. PubMed ID: 18049363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and reliability of objective image analysis compared to subjective grading of bulbar hyperaemia. Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1464-6. PubMed ID: 17475716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining. van der Worp E; de Brabander J; Swarbrick HA; Hendrikse F Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 19165124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales. Sorbara L; Simpson T; Duench S; Schulze M; Fonn D Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17254834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grading contact lens complications: the effect of knowledge on grading accuracy. Cardona G; Serés C Curr Eye Res; 2009 Dec; 34(12):1074-81. PubMed ID: 19958127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective assessment of corneal staining using digital image analysis. Chun YS; Yoon WB; Kim KG; Park IK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):7896-903. PubMed ID: 25406292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of subjective grading of limbal redness by eyecare practitioners in three countries. Long B Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 19474752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]