These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19165123)

  • 1. Objective grading of the anterior eye.
    Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 19165123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis.
    Wolffsohn JS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 88(11):1434-8. PubMed ID: 15489489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perceived bulbar redness of clinical grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):E1250-8. PubMed ID: 19770812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective quantification of fluorescence intensity on the corneal surface using a modified slit-lamp technique.
    Tan B; Zhou Y; Svitova T; Lin MC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2013 May; 39(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 23629006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis.
    Wolffsohn JS; Purslow C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2003 Mar; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16303494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 18385056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated measurement of bulbar redness.
    Fieguth P; Simpson T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 11818375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of validated bulbar redness grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Jones DA; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):976-83. PubMed ID: 18049363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity and reliability of objective image analysis compared to subjective grading of bulbar hyperaemia.
    Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 91(11):1464-6. PubMed ID: 17475716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining.
    van der Worp E; de Brabander J; Swarbrick HA; Hendrikse F
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 19165124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales.
    Sorbara L; Simpson T; Duench S; Schulze M; Fonn D
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17254834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia.
    Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL
    Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grading contact lens complications: the effect of knowledge on grading accuracy.
    Cardona G; Serés C
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Dec; 34(12):1074-81. PubMed ID: 19958127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective assessment of corneal staining using digital image analysis.
    Chun YS; Yoon WB; Kim KG; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):7896-903. PubMed ID: 25406292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grading bulbar redness using cross-calibrated clinical grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5812-7. PubMed ID: 21474775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of subjective grading of limbal redness by eyecare practitioners in three countries.
    Long B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 19474752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading of corneal transparency.
    O'Donnell C; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2004 Dec; 27(4):161-70. PubMed ID: 16303539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grading contact lens complications under time constraints.
    Efron N; McCubbin S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 84(12):1082-6. PubMed ID: 18091306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grading infantile cataracts.
    Forster JE; Abadi RV; Muldoon M; Lloyd IC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 16792736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Awareness of treatment: A source of bias in subjective grading of ocular complications.
    Cardona G; Esterich N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226960. PubMed ID: 31877190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.