These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19165123)

  • 21. Reliability of 4 clinical grading systems for corneal staining.
    Sook Chun Y; Park IK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):1097-102. PubMed ID: 24513097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.
    Bailey IL; Bullimore MA; Raasch TW; Taylor HR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Feb; 32(2):422-32. PubMed ID: 1993595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating a new objective grading software for conjunctival hyperaemia.
    Huntjens B; Basi M; Nagra M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 31326277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Katsara SS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jan; 21(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11220037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring retinal vessel tortuosity in 10-year-old children: validation of the Computer-Assisted Image Analysis of the Retina (CAIAR) program.
    Owen CG; Rudnicka AR; Mullen R; Barman SA; Monekosso D; Whincup PH; Ng J; Paterson C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):2004-10. PubMed ID: 19324866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A clinical grading system for retinal inflammation in the chronic model of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis using digital fundus images.
    Xu H; Koch P; Chen M; Lau A; Reid DM; Forrester JV
    Exp Eye Res; 2008 Oct; 87(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 18634784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers.
    Pult H; Murphy PJ; Purslow C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 86(9):E1042-50. PubMed ID: 19668016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of ocular redness measurements obtained with keratograph 5M and correlation with subjective grading scales.
    Pérez-Bartolomé F; Sanz-Pozo C; Martínez-de la Casa JM; Arriola-Villalobos P; Fernández-Pérez C; García-Feijoó J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Nov; 41(9):836-846. PubMed ID: 30293826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. External ocular hyperemia: a quantifiable indicator of spacecraft air quality.
    Ogle JW; Cohen KL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 May; 67(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 8725467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anterior eye health recording.
    Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA; Christie C; Morris J; Conway R; Maldonado-Codina C;
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Aug; 38(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 25814427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema.
    Papas EB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):687-91. PubMed ID: 10711682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Limbal and bulbar hyperaemia in normal eyes.
    Pult H; Murphy PJ; Purslow C; Nyman J; Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 18201331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital image analysis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity.
    Aslam T; Fleck B; Patton N; Trucco M; Azegrouz H
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 87(4):368-77. PubMed ID: 19210329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Grading static versus dynamic images of contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Chaudry A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Sep; 90(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 17697182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimising subjective anterior eye grading precision.
    Vianya-Estopa M; Nagra M; Cochrane A; Retallic N; Dunning D; Terry L; Lloyd A; Wolffsohn JS;
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Oct; 43(5):489-492. PubMed ID: 32217051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new computer assisted objective method for quantifying vascular changes of the bulbar conjunctivae.
    Owen CG; Fitzke FW; Woodward EG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 8944187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New clinical grading scales and objective measurement for conjunctival injection.
    Park IK; Chun YS; Kim KG; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 54(8):5249-57. PubMed ID: 23833063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods.
    Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computerized analysis of retinal vessel width and tortuosity in premature infants.
    Wilson CM; Cocker KD; Moseley MJ; Paterson C; Clay ST; Schulenburg WE; Mills MD; Ells AL; Parker KH; Quinn GE; Fielder AR; Ng J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3577-85. PubMed ID: 18408177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantifying Ocular Surface Inflammation and Correlating It With Inflammatory Cell Infiltration In Vivo: A Novel Method.
    Ferrari G; Rabiolo A; Bignami F; Sizzano F; Palini A; Villa C; Rama P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 56(12):7067-75. PubMed ID: 26529042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.