420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19165989)
1. Possible effects of the proposed Highmark/IBC consolidation.
Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2008; 75(6):15. PubMed ID: 19165989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wis. hospitals brandish self-insurance scalpel.
Maes J
Bus Insur; 1979 Apr; 13(9):115. PubMed ID: 10241056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Highmark, Independence join merger frenzy. Pa. Blues deal OK could take two years; insurer would control half of state's market.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(14):10. PubMed ID: 17444262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HEW study finds commercial insurers "more cost-minimizing" than Blue Cross-Blue Shield.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Feb; 31(8):54-6. PubMed ID: 10304811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Steely competition. In the Pittsburgh market, it's behemoth healthcare system vs. dominant insurer. And the battles have become fiery indeed.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2002 Mar; 32(12):28-31. PubMed ID: 11951352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Blue Cross-Shield act to halt reimbursement for routine tests.
Staver S
Am Med News; 1979 Feb; 22(7):1, 16. PubMed ID: 10316780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Blue shield of California fosters ambulatory care plan.
Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):19-20. PubMed ID: 457069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biased selection in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.
Price JR; Mays JW
Inquiry; 1985; 22(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 2933333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Full disclosure.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2001 Mar; 97(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 11320962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. For-profit conversion and merger trends among Blue Cross Blue Shield health plans.
Grossman JM; Strunk BC
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2004 Jan; (76):1-6. PubMed ID: 14976992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The US pluralistic health-care sector.
Ginzberg E; Ostow M
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1997; 74(2):156-72. PubMed ID: 9439855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Firms drop Blue Shield for wraparound plans.
Norris E
Bus Insur; 1981 Feb; 15(6):1-25. PubMed ID: 10249540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Challenging Highmark. Physicians in Pa. who opposed Blues merger are likely to get new hearing.
Hensley S
Mod Healthc; 1997 Oct; 27(40):33. PubMed ID: 10173628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Society granted right to challenge Highmark merger.
Pa Med; 1999 Mar; 102(3):4. PubMed ID: 10097604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-insured health coverage.
Hawkins J
Tex Hosp; 1979 Aug; 35(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 10243718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Blue Shield and the nurse-midwives.
Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979 Sep; 4(9):281-8. PubMed ID: 10245472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Two views of Anthem's IPO. Blues giant sees economies of scale, while critics fear higher premiums, less care.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2001 Nov; 31(45):16-7. PubMed ID: 11727455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diluting the effect of the Blues.
Wise D
Bus Health; 1994 Mar; 12(3):53-4. PubMed ID: 10132630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can health insurance be competitive?
Greenberg W
Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 566700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-profit Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans have been limiting the rise in their health care premiums this year.
Fine A
Manag Care Q; 2004; 12(3):iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15702558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
