These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19166550)

  • 1. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source.
    Jasinevicius TR; Curd FM; Schilling L; Sadan A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 19166550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources.
    Curd FM; Jasinevicius TR; Graves A; Cox V; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of shade taking by dental undergraduates.
    McAndrew R; Chan PW; Milward PJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 20397497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons.
    Poljak-Guberina R; Celebic A; Powers JM; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e17-22. PubMed ID: 21996337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Keyvanloo S; Alavi S; Jafarzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23579903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of colour defective vision on shade matching accuracy.
    Ethell J; Jarad FD; Youngson CC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Sep; 14(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students.
    Jaju RA; Nagai S; Karimbux N; Da Silva JD
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Sep; 74(9):1002-10. PubMed ID: 20837742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color perception among different dental personnel.
    Sim CP; Yap AU; Teo J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 11551006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting VITA classical shades with the VITA 3D-master shade guide.
    Zenthöfer A; Wiesberg S; Hildenbrandt A; Reinelt G; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 25010883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.