These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Communication is vital to produce natural looking metal ceramic crowns. Jun S J Dent Technol; 1997 Oct; 14(8):15-20. PubMed ID: 9586552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical effect of different shade guide systems on the tooth shades of ceramic-veneered restorations. Hassel AJ; Koke U; Schmitter M; Beck J; Rammelsberg P Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 16220809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A simple screening test for color matching in dentistry. Yorty JS; Richards MW; Kanawati A; Davis S; House RC; Okubo SR Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 11199592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Shade Matching Ability among Dental Students under Different Lighting Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study. Jouhar R Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Shade selection and value control. Eves MG J Dent Technol; 2000; 17(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11323823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides. Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods. Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Variations of L*a*b* values among Vitapan Classical Shade Guides. King KA; deRijk WG J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 17559535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of gender, experience, and value on color perception. Milagres V; Teixeira ML; Miranda ME; Osorio Silva CH; Ribeiro Pinto JR Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22335300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation. Kanawati A; Richards MW Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Estimating costs for shade matching and shade corrections of fixed partial dentures for dental technicians in Germany: a pilot investigation. Corcodel N; Zenthöfer A; Setz J; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Sep; 69(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 21470063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of individual shades on reliability and validity of observers in colour matching. Lagouvardos PE; Diamanti H; Polyzois G Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Jun; 12(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 15244007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]