These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19166870)

  • 21. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The quiet clam is quite calm: transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading.
    Johnson RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):943-69. PubMed ID: 19586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).
    Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Drieghe D; Slattery TJ; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):520-9; discussion 530-7. PubMed ID: 17696697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.
    Rayner K; Warren T; Juhasz BJ; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1290-301. PubMed ID: 15521805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1916-8. PubMed ID: 19154753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis.
    Hyönä J; Häikiö T
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Dec; 46(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 16277648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Space information is important for reading.
    Perea M; Acha J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):1994-2000. PubMed ID: 19463847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimal viewing position effects in reading Finnish.
    Hyönä J; Bertram R
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(11):1279-87. PubMed ID: 21496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements.
    Chamberland C; Saint-Aubin J; Légère MA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 22686151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity.
    Demberg V; Keller F
    Cognition; 2008 Nov; 109(2):193-210. PubMed ID: 18930455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinct processing of function verb categories in the human brain.
    Briem D; Balliel B; Rockstroh B; Butt M; Schulte im Walde S; Assadollahi R
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1249():173-80. PubMed ID: 19007757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An event-related potential study of the concreteness effect between Chinese nouns and verbs.
    Tsai PS; Yu BH; Lee CY; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Wu DH
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():149-60. PubMed ID: 19059223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Syntactic priming in comprehension: the role of argument order and animacy.
    Carminati MN; van Gompel RP; Scheepers C; Arai M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1098-110. PubMed ID: 18763894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic feature activation takes time: longer SOA elicits earlier priming effects during reading.
    Hofmann MJ; Kleemann MA; Roelke-Wellmann A; Vorstius C; Radach R
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 35254545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.