These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1916726)

  • 1. PROs' new quality improvement focus: will it work in practice?
    Hudson T
    Hospitals; 1991 Nov; 65(21):48-50. PubMed ID: 1916726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
    Siegel SH
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Fourth PRO Scope of Work: automating the medical review process through the Uniform Clinical Data Set.
    Baker NA
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):11-9. PubMed ID: 10119374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New direction for PRO program presents challenges for hospitals.
    Granatir T
    Trustee; 1993 Mar; 46(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 10124501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
    Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between adjusted hospital mortality and the results of peer review.
    Hartz AJ; Gottlieb MS; Kuhn EM; Rimm AA
    Health Serv Res; 1993 Feb; 27(6):765-77. PubMed ID: 8428812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Health Care Quality Improvement Program: the WVMI returns to its founding mission.
    Weeks HS
    W V Med J; 1994 Apr; 90(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 8009870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PROs, providers and physicians to collaborate on cardiac outcomes.
    Koska MT
    Hospitals; 1992 Aug; 66(15):36, 38. PubMed ID: 1639370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: revised scopes of work for Delaware, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, and Wyoming--HCFA. Final notice.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Sep; 56(171):43790-3. PubMed ID: 10113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HCFA's close encounter with CQI.
    QRC Advis; 1992 May; 8(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 10118704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the principal clinical coordinator in the Health Care Financing Administration's Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Elward KS; Martin D; Merwin E; Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1994; 2(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10161149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHA submits PRO photocopying costs and Health Care Quality Improvement Act comments.
    Rothschild IS
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):5-6. PubMed ID: 10287419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computerized method to monitor appropriateness of care.
    Hartz AJ; Epple P; Dix SK
    QRC Advis; 1994 Feb; 10(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 10132166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare program; acquisition, protection, and disclosure of utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) information--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15347-64. PubMed ID: 10299991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PROs: peering harder in the '90s.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(3):42-6. PubMed ID: 2912854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medicare program; acquisition, protection and disclosure of utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) information--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(74):14977-86. PubMed ID: 10273479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.