These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Corneal topography and soft contact lens fit. Young G; Schnider C; Hunt C; Efron S Optom Vis Sci; 2010 May; 87(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 20386354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical investigation of the base curve and comfort rate of a new prototype silicone hydrogel contact lens. Santodomingo-Rubido J; Rubido-Crespo MJ Eye Contact Lens; 2008 May; 34(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 18463479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-eye performance of soft contact lenses made from different materials. Tranoudis I; Efron N Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2004 Sep; 27(3):133-48. PubMed ID: 16303536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of end of day silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lens fit on ocular comfort, physiology and lens wettability. Wolffsohn J; Hall L; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 25911987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of corneoscleral topography on soft contact lens fit. Hall LA; Young G; Wolffsohn JS; Riley C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6801-6. PubMed ID: 21685339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consensus on recording of gas permeable contact lens fit. Wolffsohn JS; van der Worp E; de Brabander J; Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Dec; 36(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 23538149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics. Young G Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 73(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 8728492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact lens fitting profile in Portugal in 2005: strategies for first fits and refits. González-Méijome JM; Jorge J; Almeida JB; Parafita MA Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17496700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fitting characteristics of 1-day and 14-day Acuvue disposable contact lenses. Le AH; Liem SE; Su JL; Harris MG Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Dec; 73(12):750-3. PubMed ID: 9002092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses. Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of soft contact lens edge design and midperipheral lens shape on the epithelium and its indentation with lens mobility. Wolffsohn JS; Drew T; Dhallu S; Sheppard A; Hofmann GJ; Prince M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 54(9):6190-7. PubMed ID: 23942975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fitting stability of the different soft toric contact lenses. Momeni-Moghaddam H; Naroo SA; Askarizadeh F; Tahmasebi F Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Oct; 37(5):346-50. PubMed ID: 24894546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of hydrogel lens settling on the thickness of the tears and contact lens. Nichols JJ; King-Smith PE Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2549-54. PubMed ID: 15277476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of internal lubricating agents of disposable soft contact lenses on higher-order aberrations after blinking. Koh S; Maeda N; Hamano T; Hirohara Y; Mihashi T; Hori Y; Hosohata J; Fujikado T; Tano Y Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Mar; 34(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18327045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of video-keratoscopy in predicting contact lens parameters for keratoconic fitting. Sorbara L; Dalton K Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Jun; 33(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 20129811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]