These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of the normal values for signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Marcus FI; Zareba W; Sherrill D J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 17338774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the lessons learned from the assessment of automated electrocardiogram analysis in the Common Standards for quantitative Electrocardiography study benefit measurement of delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images? Fayn J; Rubel P; Macfarlane PW J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 17478178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A proposal for a T-wave alternans index. Madias JE J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6):479-81. PubMed ID: 17543326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. V. Suggested standards for instrumentation in computer processing of electrocardiograms. Sherwood JD Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1259-61. PubMed ID: 4574249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. European Conformance Testing Services for computerized electrocardiography. New procedures and standards. Zywietz C; Willems JL J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():137-46. PubMed ID: 8189115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. IV. Suggested minimal performance requirements and methods of performance evaluation for computer ECG analysis programs. Helppi RR; Unite V; Wolf HK Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1251-9. PubMed ID: 4574248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. II. Some considerations relevant to the selection of ECG Program. Milliken JA Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 4574246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Current status of clinical electrocardiography with suggestions for the improvement of the interpretive process. Hurst JW Am J Cardiol; 2003 Nov; 92(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 14583358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the standards for evaluation of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: a second opinion. Rautaharju PM J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 19695378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative evaluations between on-line and off-line in automatic electrocardiographic diagnosis and readings of the cardiologist]. Bigalli A; Ciuti M; Davini P; Puccini E; Sicca GT Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3297-300. PubMed ID: 7010213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A plea for common standards in computer aided ECG analysis. Willems JL Comput Biomed Res; 1980 Apr; 13(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 6988158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Usefulness of multicenter evaluation of the reliability of a program for automatic analysis in clinical electrocardiography]. Feruglio GA; Liverani M; Sicca GT; Zecchi P; Bigalli A; Feraco E; Loperfido F; Marchei M; Mirolo R; Puccini E Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3289-96. PubMed ID: 7010212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]