These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19168085)

  • 21. Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.
    Dufour A; Touzalin P; Candas V
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 17146643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.
    Garza JP; Eslinger PJ; Barrett AM
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 18381226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf.
    Roberts R; Turnbull OH
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Epidemiology of traumatic upper limb amputations.
    Pomares G; Coudane H; Dap F; Dautel G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 104(2):273-276. PubMed ID: 29410334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pseudoneglect of males and females on a spatial short-term memory task.
    Nalçaci E; Ciçek M; Kalaycioglu C; Yavuzer S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Feb; 84(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 9132740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhanced left-finger deftness following dominant upper- and lower-limb amputation.
    Swanberg KM; Clark AM; Kline JE; Yurkiewicz IR; Chan BL; Pasquina PF; Heilman KM; Tsao JW
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011 Sep; 25(7):680-4. PubMed ID: 21478497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Peripersonal spatial attention in children with spina bifida: associations between horizontal and vertical line bisection and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, midbrain, and posterior cortex.
    Dennis M; Edelstein K; Frederick J; Copeland K; Francis D; Blaser SE; Kramer LA; Drake JM; Brandt M; Hetherington R; Fletcher JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2000-10. PubMed ID: 15893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway: prevalence, demographic features and amputation specific features. A population-based survey.
    Østlie K; Skjeldal OH; Garfelt B; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(17-18):1636-49. PubMed ID: 21174629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lateral and vertical attentional biases in normal individuals.
    Drago V; Foster PS; Webster DG; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 117(10):1415-24. PubMed ID: 17729153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiple reference frames in neglect? An investigation of the object-centred frame and the dissociation between "near" and "far" from the body by use of a mirror.
    Laeng B; Brennen T; Johannessen K; Holmen K; Elvestad R
    Cortex; 2002 Sep; 38(4):511-28. PubMed ID: 12465666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between collisions and pseudoneglect: is it right?
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L; Oriet C
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 21696716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distribution of attention in normal people as a function of spatial location: right-left, up-down.
    Drago V; Crucian GP; Pisani F; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Jul; 12(4):532-7. PubMed ID: 16981605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Directional collisions during a route-following task.
    Thomas NA; Stuckel D; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Mar; 15(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 19203435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of rightward and leftward spatial deviations of spatial attention on emotional picture recognition.
    Mańkowska A; Harciarek M; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Nov; 40(9):951-962. PubMed ID: 29690819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.