BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

992 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19168276)

  • 1. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience.
    Breda A; Finelli A; Janetschek G; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2009 Apr; 55(4):836-50. PubMed ID: 19168276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: an overview].
    Khoder WY; Stief CG; Becker AJ
    Urologe A; 2009 Dec; 48(12):1523-34. PubMed ID: 19953357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.
    Heuer R; Gill IS; Guazzoni G; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Richie JP; de la Rosette JJ
    Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 19853989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses.
    O'Malley RL; Berger AD; Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman M; Taneja SS
    BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 17092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.
    Pyo P; Chen A; Grasso M
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (more than 7 cm) renal masses.
    Berger AD; Kanofsky JA; O'Malley RL; Hyams ES; Chang C; Taneja SS; Stifelman MD
    Urology; 2008 Mar; 71(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 18342177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of the complications of laparoscopic renal surgery: comparison of procedures and techniques.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Gee JR; Bruskewitz RC; Nakada SY
    J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1208-13. PubMed ID: 16515961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.
    Gill IS; Kavoussi LR; Lane BR; Blute ML; Babineau D; Colombo JR; Frank I; Permpongkosol S; Weight CJ; Kaouk JH; Kattan MW; Novick AC
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 17574056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
    Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes.
    Simmons MN; Weight CJ; Gill IS
    Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 19394509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature.
    Porpiglia F; Volpe A; Billia M; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):732-42; discussion 742-3. PubMed ID: 18222599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
    Tsujihata M; Nonomura N; Momohara C; Nishimura K; Tsujimura A; Okuyama A
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 18931547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations.
    Fugita OE; Chan DY; Roberts WW; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):247-52; discussion 252. PubMed ID: 14972463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operative outcomes of upper pole laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of lower pole laparoscopic and upper pole open partial nephrectomy.
    Zorn KC; Gong EM; Mendiola FP; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Gofrit ON; Steinberg GD; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2007 Jul; 70(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 17656202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney.
    Lane BR; Novick AC; Babineau D; Fergany AF; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):847-51; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 18221958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery.
    Van Poppel H
    Int J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):314-26. PubMed ID: 20409229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approach.
    Shuford MD; McDougall EM; Chang SS; LaFleur BJ; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 15082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy in patients with cirrhosis: report of three cases.
    Hayn MH; Averch TD; Jackman SV
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4770-3. PubMed ID: 19671237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
    Nguyen MM; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):627-32; discussion 632. PubMed ID: 18082215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.