328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19169639)
21. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part III. Postoperative changes after isolated superior repositioning.
de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 9456605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery.
Hajeer MY; Ayoub AF; Millett DT
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 42(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 15336764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Morphology of open bite.
Krey KF; Dannhauer KH; Hierl T
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 May; 76(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 25929714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Facial templates: a new perspective in three dimensions.
Kau CH; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Cronin A; Savio C; Mallorie C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 16420270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cephalometric study of elderly with nearly intact dental arches.
Shimizu T; Motegi E; Nomura M; Kaneko Y; Takeuchi F; Yamaguchi T; Miyazaki H; Harazaki M; Hirai M; Kurihara S; Yamaguchi H
Gerodontology; 2006 Mar; 23(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16433644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment.
Sforza C; Peretta R; Grandi G; Ferronato G; Ferrario VF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):691-8. PubMed ID: 18355592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography.
Jung YJ; Kim MJ; Baek SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):763-771.e8. PubMed ID: 19272814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
Michiels G; Sather AH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography].
Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Facial anthropometrics versus cephalometry as predictors for surgical treatment in patients with Class III dentofacial deformities.
Magalhaes AE; Stella JP; Epker BN
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9082019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex.
Rosas A; Bastir M
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 Mar; 117(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11842403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
Kale-Varlk S
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects.
Alkofide EA
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 17693429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stereo-assisted landmark detection for the analysis of changes in 3-D facial shape.
Naftel AJ; Trenouth MJ
Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 15370994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
