These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19170134)

  • 1. Genotype-based matching to correct for population stratification in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.
    Guan W; Liang L; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 33(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 19170134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel genetic matching methods for handling population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Lacour A; Schüller V; Drichel D; Herold C; Jessen F; Leber M; Maier W; Noethen MM; Ramirez A; Vaitsiakhovich T; Becker T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():84. PubMed ID: 25880419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 19235185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of methods for adjusting population stratification in genome-wide association studies: Standard versus categorical principal component analysis.
    Turkmen AS; Yuan Y; Billor N
    Ann Hum Genet; 2019 Nov; 83(6):454-464. PubMed ID: 31322288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analysis of population stratification using random SNPs in genome-wide association studies].
    Cao ZF; Ma CX; Wang L; Cai B
    Yi Chuan; 2010 Sep; 32(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 20870613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Genome-wide association study on complex diseases: genetic statistical issues].
    Yan WL
    Yi Chuan; 2008 May; 30(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 18487142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the impact of population stratification on association studies of rare variation.
    Jiang Y; Epstein MP; Conneely KN
    Hum Hered; 2013; 76(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23921847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Case-control association studies with matching and genomic controlling.
    Lee WC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15185398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On genome-wide association studies for family-based designs: an integrative analysis approach combining ascertained family samples with unselected controls.
    Lasky-Su J; Won S; Mick E; Anney RJ; Franke B; Neale B; Biederman J; Smalley SL; Loo SK; Todorov A; Faraone SV; Weiss ST; Lange C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2010 Apr; 86(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 20346434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-wide association studies.
    Iles MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():89-103. PubMed ID: 21153613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using public control genotype data to increase power and decrease cost of case-control genetic association studies.
    Ho LA; Lange EM
    Hum Genet; 2010 Dec; 128(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 20821337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-random error in genotype calling procedures: implications for family-based and case-control genome-wide association studies.
    Anney RJ; Kenny E; O'Dushlaine CT; Lasky-Su J; Franke B; Morris DW; Neale BM; Asherson P; Faraone SV; Gill M
    Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet; 2008 Dec; 147B(8):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18663727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratification-score matching improves correction for confounding by population stratification in case-control association studies.
    Epstein MP; Duncan R; Broadaway KA; He M; Allen AS; Satten GA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 22714934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On a semiparametric test to detect associations between quantitative traits and candidate genes using unrelated individuals.
    Zhang S; Zhu X; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12508255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A permutation test for oligoset DNA pooling studies.
    Huang HY; Lin JH; Lee WC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119096. PubMed ID: 25763822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating single-locus tests into haplotype cladistic analysis in case-control studies.
    Liu J; Papasian C; Deng HW
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e46. PubMed ID: 17381242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CAPL: a novel association test using case-control and family data and accounting for population stratification.
    Chung RH; Schmidt MA; Morris RW; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 34(7):747-55. PubMed ID: 20878716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analyses.
    Sillanpää MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Apr; 106(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20628415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.