267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19170454)
1. Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.
Walters ST; Vader AM; Harris TR; Field CA; Jouriles EN
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2009 Feb; 77(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 19170454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students.
Juárez P; Walters ST; Daugherty M; Radi C
J Drug Educ; 2006; 36(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 17345916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Components evaluation of a web-based personalized normative feedback intervention for alcohol use among college students: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a dismantling design.
Bedendo A; McCambridge J; Gaume J; Souza AAL; Formigoni MLOS; Noto AR
Addiction; 2020 Jun; 115(6):1063-1074. PubMed ID: 31785189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.
Murphy JG; Benson TA; Vuchinich RE; Deskins MM; Eakin D; Flood AM; McDevitt-Murphy ME; Torrealday O
J Stud Alcohol; 2004 Mar; 65(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15151350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-Session Alcohol Interventions for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Samson JE; Tanner-Smith EE
J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2015 Jul; 76(4):530-43. PubMed ID: 26098028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes.
Vader AM; Walters ST; Prabhu GC; Houck JM; Field CA
Psychol Addict Behav; 2010 Jun; 24(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 20565145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking.
Murphy JG; Dennhardt AA; Skidmore JR; Martens MP; McDevitt-Murphy ME
Psychol Addict Behav; 2010 Dec; 24(4):628-39. PubMed ID: 21198224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of motivational interviewing with feedback to reduce drinking among a sample of college students.
Cowell AJ; Brown JM; Mills MJ; Bender RH; Wedehase BJ
J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2012 Mar; 73(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 22333330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sustain talk predicts poorer outcomes among mandated college student drinkers receiving a brief motivational intervention.
Apodaca TR; Borsari B; Jackson KM; Magill M; Longabaugh R; Mastroleo NR; Barnett NP
Psychol Addict Behav; 2014 Sep; 28(3):631-8. PubMed ID: 25222170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of normative feedback for drinkers who consume less than the norm: Dodging the boomerang.
Prince MA; Reid A; Carey KB; Neighbors C
Psychol Addict Behav; 2014 Jun; 28(2):538-44. PubMed ID: 24955672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of motivational interviewing intervention on blackouts among college freshmen.
Kazemi DM; Levine MJ; Dmochowski J; Nies MA; Sun L
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2013 Sep; 45(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 23676101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.
Foxcroft DR; Moreira MT; Almeida Santimano NM; Smith LA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 1():CD006748. PubMed ID: 25622306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examination of posttraining supervision of peer counselors in a motivational enhancement intervention to reduce drinking in a sample of heavy-drinking college students.
Mastroleo NR; Turrisi R; Carney JV; Ray AE; Larimer ME
J Subst Abuse Treat; 2010 Oct; 39(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 20673621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.
Larimer ME; Lee CM; Kilmer JR; Fabiano PM; Stark CB; Geisner IM; Mallett KA; Lostutter TW; Cronce JM; Feeney M; Neighbors C
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 17469886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking.
Murphy JG; Dennhardt AA; Skidmore JR; Borsari B; Barnett NP; Colby SM; Martens MP
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2012 Oct; 80(5):876-86. PubMed ID: 22663899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of computerized alcohol intervention tailored to drinking motives among college students: a quasi-experimental pilot study.
Canale N; Vieno A; Santinello M; Chieco F; Andriolo S
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2015 Mar; 41(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25700006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PNF 2.0? Initial evidence that gamification can increase the efficacy of brief, web-based personalized normative feedback alcohol interventions.
Boyle SC; Earle AM; LaBrie JW; Smith DJ
Addict Behav; 2017 Apr; 67():8-17. PubMed ID: 27978426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.
Murphy JG; Duchnick JJ; Vuchinich RE; Davison JW; Karg RS; Olson AM; Smith AF; Coffey TT
Psychol Addict Behav; 2001 Dec; 15(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 11767271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readiness to change drinking behavior in female college students.
Kaysen DL; Lee CM; Labrie JW; Tollison SJ
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl; 2009 Jul; (16):106-14. PubMed ID: 19538918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between baseline drinking status, peer motivational interviewing microskills, and drinking outcomes in a brief alcohol intervention for matriculating college students: a replication.
Tollison SJ; Mastroleo NR; Mallett KA; Witkiewitz K; Lee CM; Ray AE; Larimer ME
Behav Ther; 2013 Mar; 44(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 23312433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
