These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19170472)

  • 21. Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space.
    Janzen G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):493-508. PubMed ID: 16627352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Body- and environmental-stabilized processing of spatial knowledge.
    Mou W; Li X; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 18315416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrieving enduring spatial representations after disorientation.
    Li X; Mou W; McNamara TP
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 22682765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.
    Mou W; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 11827078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning.
    Fields AW; Shelton AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):506-15. PubMed ID: 16719662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Horizontal saccadic eye movements enhance the retrieval of landmark shape and location information.
    Brunyé TT; Mahoney CR; Augustyn JS; Taylor HA
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Aug; 70(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 19346050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrating visuospatial information across distinct experiences.
    Pantelides SN; Avraamides MN
    Cogn Process; 2019 Aug; 20(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 30806841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mental layout extrapolations prime spatial processing of scenes.
    Gottesman CV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):382-95. PubMed ID: 21463084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A computational cognitive model of judgments of relative direction.
    Newman PM; Cox GE; McNamara TP
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104559. PubMed ID: 33388527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking.
    Riecke BE; McNamara TP
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():1-14. PubMed ID: 28802103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The behavioural consequences of dissociating the spatial directions of eye and arm movements.
    Gorbet DJ; Sergio LE
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1284():77-88. PubMed ID: 19497310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments.
    Valiquette CM; McNamara TP; Labrecque JS
    Psychol Res; 2007 May; 71(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 16957954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Qualitative differences in memory for vista and environmental spaces are caused by opaque borders, not movement or successive presentation.
    Meilinger T; Strickrodt M; Bülthoff HH
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():77-95. PubMed ID: 27367592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mental representations of recently learned nested environments.
    Wang Y; Yu X; Dou Y; McNamara TP; Li J
    Psychol Res; 2021 Nov; 85(8):2922-2934. PubMed ID: 33211160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Representing Spatial Layout According to Intrinsic Frames of Reference: Limitations From Position Regularity and Instructions.
    Xie C; Li S; Tao W; Wei Y; Sun HJ
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Oct; 120(5):846-869. PubMed ID: 28580837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence of anticipatory eye movements in the spatial Hebb repetition effect: insights for modeling sequence learning.
    Tremblay S; Saint-Aubin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1256-65. PubMed ID: 19686019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrinsic array structure is neither necessary nor sufficient for nonegocentric coding of spatial layouts.
    Greenauer N; Waller D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Oct; 15(5):1015-21. PubMed ID: 18926998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Object-centered reference systems and human spatial memory.
    Chen X; McNamara T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):985-91. PubMed ID: 21786070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: group differences and strategies.
    Gugerty L; Brooks J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Jun; 10(2):75-88. PubMed ID: 15222802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects.
    Palmer SE; Gardner JS; Wickens TD
    Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):421-49. PubMed ID: 18534113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.