These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19170475)

  • 1. Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.
    Chan LK; Hayward WG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):119-32. PubMed ID: 19170475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions.
    Mortier K; Theeuwes J; Starreveld P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):542-57. PubMed ID: 15982130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
    Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):283-317. PubMed ID: 19348543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating a space-variant weighted salience account of visual selection.
    Vincent BT; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(13):1809-20. PubMed ID: 17466357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: a common salience route for detection and compound tasks.
    Zehetleitner M; Proulx MJ; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1760-70. PubMed ID: 19933560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does training under consistent mapping conditions lead to automatic attention attraction to targets in search tasks?
    Lefebvre C; Cousineau D; Larochelle S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1401-15. PubMed ID: 19064486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.
    Tanaka G; Mori S; Inadomi H; Hamada Y; Ohta Y; Ozawa H
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jan; 149(1-3):25-31. PubMed ID: 17123633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The speed of feature-based attention: attentional advantage is slow, but selection is fast.
    Huang L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 20718572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects.
    Krummenacher J; Grubert A; Müller HJ
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1382-95. PubMed ID: 20382173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrupted visual searches reveal volatile search memory.
    Shen YJ; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1208-20. PubMed ID: 17002532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.
    Eckstein MP; Peterson MF; Pham BT; Droll JA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1097-128. PubMed ID: 19138699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal feature integration in visual search.
    Vincent BT; Baddeley RJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):15.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search.
    Huang L; Pashler H
    Cognition; 2005 Jan; 94(3):B101-11. PubMed ID: 15617666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.
    Berger A; Henik A; Rafal R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 15869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.