These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19170780)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of increasing access to mammography through mobile mammography for older women.
    Naeim A; Keeler E; Bassett LW; Parikh J; Bastani R; Reuben DB
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2009 Feb; 57(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 19170780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Mobile Mammography Unit for Breast Cancer Screening to Reduce Geographic and Social Health Inequalities.
    De Mil R; Guillaume E; Launay L; Guittet L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Notari A; Launoy G; Berchi C
    Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 31563253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to establish a cost-effective mobile mammography program.
    Carkaci S; Geiser WR; Adrada BE; Marquez C; Whitman GJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):W691-7. PubMed ID: 24147498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 7724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
    Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.
    Bryan S; Brown J; Warren R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Feb; 49(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 7707010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hidden costs of mobile mammography: is subsidization necessary?
    Wolk RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jun; 158(6):1243-5. PubMed ID: 1590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Program-specific cost-effectiveness analysis: breast cancer screening policies for a safety-net program.
    Melnikow J; Tancredi DJ; Yang Z; Ritley D; Jiang Y; Slee C; Popova S; Rylett P; Knutson K; Smalley S
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):932-41. PubMed ID: 24041343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
    Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low cost mammography screening. Practical considerations with emphasis on mobile operation.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1688-91. PubMed ID: 3651995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to enhance mammography use.
    Fishman P; Taplin S; Meyer D; Barlow W
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):213-20. PubMed ID: 11185326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
    Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia.
    Wang S; Merlin T; Kreisz F; Craft P; Hiller JE
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 33(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 19811478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
    Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to enhance mammography compliance using computer modeling (CAN*TROL).
    Wu JH; Fung MC; Chan W; Lairson DR
    Value Health; 2004; 7(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15164807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How important are psychosocial predictors of mammography receipt among older women when immediate access is provided via on-site service?
    Glenn B; Bastani R; Reuben D
    Am J Health Promot; 2006; 20(4):237-46. PubMed ID: 16562348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.
    de Gelder R; Bulliard JL; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; Schopper D; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 19038540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
    Peek ME; Han J
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
    Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
    Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.