These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19170937)

  • 1. The wisdom of many in one mind: improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping.
    Herzog SM; Hertwig R
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Feb; 20(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 19170937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harnessing the wisdom of the inner crowd.
    Herzog SM; Hertwig R
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Oct; 18(10):504-6. PubMed ID: 25261350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Think twice and then: combining or choosing in dialectical bootstrapping?
    Herzog SM; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):218-32. PubMed ID: 24016140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.
    Bosworth B; Burtless G; Steuerle E
    Soc Secur Bull; 2000; 63(4):74-98. PubMed ID: 11641991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The wisdom of select crowds.
    Mannes AE; Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Aug; 107(2):276-99. PubMed ID: 25090129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Group discussion improves lie detection.
    Klein N; Epley N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does ADHD in adults affect the relative accuracy of metamemory judgments?
    Knouse LE; Paradise MJ; Dunlosky J
    J Atten Disord; 2006 Nov; 10(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 17085626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.
    Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):780-805. PubMed ID: 19379049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting Erroneous Divergent Opinions Increases the Wisdom of Crowds.
    Barrera-Lemarchand F; Balenzuela P; Bahrami B; Deroy O; Navajas J
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Jun; ():9567976241252138. PubMed ID: 38865591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence in judgments of comparative, own, and average person's risk.
    Gold RS
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Oct; 103(2):591-4. PubMed ID: 19102484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laypeople's conceptions of wisdom and its development: cognitive and integrative views.
    Glück J; Bluck S
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2011 May; 66(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 21398417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds.
    de Oliveira S; Nisbett RE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(9):2066-2071. PubMed ID: 29440376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds.
    Becker J; Brackbill D; Centola D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(26):E5070-E5076. PubMed ID: 28607070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment. Part I. Characterization of personal exposure to benzene.
    Walker KD; Evans JS; MacIntosh D
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(4):308-22. PubMed ID: 11571610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The curious anomaly of skewed judgment distributions and systematic error in the wisdom of crowds.
    Nash UW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112386. PubMed ID: 25406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?
    Logan P; Ramachandran G; Mulhausen J; Hewett P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jun; 53(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19332428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collective intelligence improves probabilistic diagnostic assessments.
    Stehouwer NR; Torrey KW; Dell MS
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2023 May; 10(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 36797838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.
    Willis J; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 16866745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding how nurse practitioners estimate patients' risk for coronary heart disease: a judgment analysis.
    Beckstead JW; Stamp KD
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Nov; 60(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 17822424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.