These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19171462)

  • 1. The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests.
    Borm GF; Lemmers O; Fransen J; Donders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):711-715.e1. PubMed ID: 19171462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hotel-based rheumatology, and more.
    Leeb BF
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):455-6; author reply 456-7. PubMed ID: 19208582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Roaming through methodology. XXV. Outcome measures, surrogate outcomes, and intermediate measures].
    Boers M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Oct; 144(41):1949-52. PubMed ID: 11048558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding clinical trial outcomes: design, analysis, and interpretation.
    Jacobe HT; Leitenberger JJ; Bergstresser PR
    Dermatol Ther; 2007; 20(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 17537135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine.
    Willenheimer R
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2001; 44(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 11727275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of clinical studies suggests those with multiple objectives should have at least 90% power for each endpoint.
    Borm GF; Houben RM; Welsing PM; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16360554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of the limitations of statistical analysis of treatment outcomes used in periodontal research.
    Galgut PN
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 5(4):92-7. PubMed ID: 14604057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation studies of surrogate endpoint validation using single trial and multitrial statistical approaches.
    Lassere M; Johnson K; Hughes M; Altman D; Buyse M; Galbraith S; Wells G
    J Rheumatol; 2007 Mar; 34(3):616-9. PubMed ID: 17343308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EULAR points to consider for conducting clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Gordon C; Bertsias G; Ioannidis JP; Boletis J; Bombardieri S; Cervera R; Dostál C; Font J; Gilboe IM; Houssiau F; Huizinga TW; Isenberg D; Kallenberg CG; Khamashta MA; Piette JC; Schneider M; Smolen JS; Sturfelt G; Tincani A; Van Vollenhoven R; Boumpas DT
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2009 Apr; 68(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 18388158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.
    Revicki D; Hays RD; Cella D; Sloan J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18177782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revise the review process of the Cochrane collaboration.
    Rosén M; Lindqvist R; Stenbeck M
    Scand J Public Health; 2002; 30(3):238-9. PubMed ID: 12227981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
    Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials.
    Appel LJ
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 1(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 17699370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It is the best of times; it is the worst of times: is there a way forward? A plethora of treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis, but critical trial design issues.
    O'Dell JR
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Dec; 56(12):3884-6. PubMed ID: 18050217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.