These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19172354)
21. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution]. Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy With Magnetic Retraction: A Video Demonstration. Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Ganesan V; Carmel M Urology; 2020 Sep; 143():258-260. PubMed ID: 32569657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of one-piece U-shaped mesh and barbed sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. García-Segui A; Lorenzo Soriano L; Costa-Martínez MA; Amorós Torres A; Gilabert A; Oltra MF Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 44(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31806248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology? Miklos JR; Moore RD J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Anatomical Outcomes Based on Suturing Technique During Vaginal Mesh Attachment in Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Bazzi AA; Osmundsen BC; Hagglund KH; Aslam MF Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):105-108. PubMed ID: 30807409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. LESS sacrocolpopexy: step by step of a simplified knotless technique. Tobias-Machado M; Chicoli FA; Costa RM; Carlos AS; Bezerra CA; Longuino LF; Starling ES; Tome AL; Pompeo AC Int Braz J Urol; 2012; 38(6):859-60. PubMed ID: 23302408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of the durability of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Elliott DS; Siddiqui SA; Chow GK J Robot Surg; 2007; 1(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 25484955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol. Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: Benefits of a Cross-shaped Mesh to Treat Difficult Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Dubuisson J; Veit-Rubin N; Bouquet de Jolinière J; Dubuisson JB J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):672. PubMed ID: 26867700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prolapse Repair: A Single Institution Study of 196 Patients. Gupta P; Ehlert M; Bartley J; Gilleran J; Killinger KA; Boura JA; Nagaraju P; Fischer M Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):408-411. PubMed ID: 28922303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database. Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]