These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19172418)
1. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Eggebø TM; Økland I; Heien C; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 19172418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study]. Ancel J; Huissoud C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction? Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction]. Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable. Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 15170797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women. Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction. Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz Z Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 17920604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial. Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor. Chaemsaithong P; Kwan AHW; Tse WT; Lim WT; Chan WWY; Chong KC; Leung TY; Poon LC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):592.e1-592.e15. PubMed ID: 30735668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]