134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19173383)
1. Modulation frequency features for phoneme recognition in noisy speech.
Ganapathy S; Thomas S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):EL8-12. PubMed ID: 19173383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal envelope compensation for robust phoneme recognition using modulation spectrum.
Ganapathy S; Thomas S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3769-80. PubMed ID: 21218908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A spectral/temporal method for robust fundamental frequency tracking.
Zahorian SA; Hu H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4559-71. PubMed ID: 18537404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined effects of frequency compression-expansion and shift on speech recognition.
Başkent D; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):277-89. PubMed ID: 17485977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suppressing aliasing noise in the speech feature domain for automatic speech recognition.
Deng H; O'Shaughnessy D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):EL8-13. PubMed ID: 18646886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal resolution analysis in frequency domain linear prediction.
Ganapathy S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL436-42. PubMed ID: 23145707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of stop place in consonant-vowel contexts using feature extrapolation of acoustic-phonetic features in telephone speech.
Lee JW; Choi JY; Kang HG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1536-46. PubMed ID: 22352523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
Xu L; Zheng Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic recognition of pathological phoneme production.
Wielgat R; Zieliński TP; Woźniak T; Grabias S; Król D
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 19011305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward optimizing stream fusion in multistream recognition of speech.
Mesgarani N; Thomas S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL14-8. PubMed ID: 21786862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectro-temporal modulation subspace-spanning filter bank features for robust automatic speech recognition.
Schädler M; Meyer BT; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4134-51. PubMed ID: 22559385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.
Stacey PC; Summerfield AQ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 18367694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration.
Shinn-Cunningham BG; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 18177159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis and prediction of acoustic speech features from mel-frequency cepstral coefficients in distributed speech recognition architectures.
Darch J; Milner B; Vaseghi S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3989-4000. PubMed ID: 19206822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic speech recognition using a predictive echo state network classifier.
Skowronski MD; Harris JG
Neural Netw; 2007 Apr; 20(3):414-23. PubMed ID: 17556115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
Jansen A; Niyogi P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rhythmic structure of Hindi and English: new insights from a computational analysis.
Das T; Singh L; Singh NC
Prog Brain Res; 2008; 168():207-72. PubMed ID: 18166397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
