These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19173426)

  • 1. Low-dimensional models of the glottal flow incorporating viscous-inviscid interaction.
    Kaburagi T; Tanabe Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):391-404. PubMed ID: 19173426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voice production model integrating boundary-layer analysis of glottal flow and source-filter coupling.
    Kaburagi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1554-67. PubMed ID: 21428519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational simulations of vocal fold vibration: Bernoulli versus Navier-Stokes.
    Decker GZ; Thomson SL
    J Voice; 2007 May; 21(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 16504473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical simulation and experimental validation of inverse quasi-one-dimensional steady and unsteady glottal flow models.
    Cisonni J; Van Hirtum A; Pelorson X; Willems J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):535-45. PubMed ID: 18646996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytic representation of volume flow as a function of geometry and pressure in a static physical model of the glottis.
    Fulcher LP; Scherer RC; Zhai G; Zhu Z
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):489-512. PubMed ID: 16434169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional nature of the glottal jet.
    Triep M; Brücker C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1537-47. PubMed ID: 20329854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal glottal configuration for ease of phonation.
    Lucero JC
    J Voice; 1998 Jun; 12(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 9649070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetric glottal jet deflection: differences of two- and three-dimensional models.
    Mattheus W; Brücker C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):EL373-9. PubMed ID: 22225129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental validation of quasi-one-dimensional and two-dimensional steady glottal flow models.
    Cisonni J; Van Hirtum A; Luo XY; Pelorson X
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Sep; 48(9):903-10. PubMed ID: 20556662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An experimental analysis of the pressures and flows within a driven mechanical model of phonation.
    Kucinschi BR; Scherer RC; Dewitt KJ; Ng TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3011-21. PubMed ID: 16708957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical mechanisms of phonation onset: a linear stability analysis of an aeroelastic continuum model of phonation.
    Zhang Z; Neubauer J; Berry DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2279-95. PubMed ID: 17902864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical assessment of unsteady aerodynamic effects in phonation.
    Krane MH; Wei T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1578-88. PubMed ID: 17004480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vocal fold bulging effects on phonation using a biophysical computer model.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2000 Dec; 14(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 11130105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of flow-structure interaction in the larynx during phonation using an immersed-boundary method.
    Luo H; Mittal R; Bielamowicz SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):816-24. PubMed ID: 19640046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of glottal angle on intraglottal pressure.
    Li S; Scherer RC; Wan M; Wang S; Wu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):539-48. PubMed ID: 16454307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flow separation in a computational oscillating vocal fold model.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1710-9. PubMed ID: 15478438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of glottal cross-section shape on theoretical flow models.
    Wu B; Van Hirtum A; Pelorson X; Luo X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):909-12. PubMed ID: 23927089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geometry of human vocal folds and glottal channel for mathematical and biomechanical modeling of voice production.
    Sidlof P; Svec JG; Horácek J; Veselý J; Klepácek I; Havlík R
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):985-95. PubMed ID: 18289553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental investigation of the influence of a posterior gap on glottal flow and sound.
    Park JB; Mongeau L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1171-9. PubMed ID: 18681605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of flow separation location on phonation onset.
    Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1689-94. PubMed ID: 19045659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.