These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19173431)

  • 1. Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.
    Oxenham AJ; Simonson AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):457-68. PubMed ID: 19173431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of low-pass filtering on masking release in understanding Mandarin sentences.
    Li H; Zhang X; Feng Y; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):EL52. PubMed ID: 31370567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.
    Freyman RL; Helfer KS; McCall DD; Clifton RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3578-88. PubMed ID: 10615698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Intelligibility for Target and Masker with Different Spectra.
    Leclère T; Théry D; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():257-266. PubMed ID: 27080666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
    Martin BA; Sigal A; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech.
    Binns C; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1765. PubMed ID: 17927436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of phoneme compression schemes designed to compensate for temporal and spectral masking in background noise.
    Goedegebure A; Goedegebure-Hulshof M; Dreschler WA; Verschuure J
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Nov; 44(11):647-55. PubMed ID: 16379493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11951851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Signal detection and pitch ranking in conditions of masking release.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Dev MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1746-54. PubMed ID: 9301052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
    Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
    Madsen SMK; Dau T; Oxenham AJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249654. PubMed ID: 33826663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.