114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1917453)
41. Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics.
Neilson A; Jones RK
J Adv Nurs; 1998 Sep; 28(3):571-5. PubMed ID: 9756225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Informed choice on Pap smear still limited by lack of knowledge on the meaning of false-positive or false-negative test results.
Korfage IJ; van Ballegooijen M; Wauben B; Habbema JD; Essink-Bot ML
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Nov; 85(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 21269793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Women's knowledge of and attitude towards organized cervical smear screening.
Larsen LP; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Nov; 77(10):988-96. PubMed ID: 9849843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Attitudes to screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Sparén P
Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Aug; 12(6):519-28. PubMed ID: 11519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cervical smears: comparison of knowledge and practice of a general practice sample with a high-risk group.
ní Riain A; Stewart M; Phelan D; Bury G; Mulcahy F
Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Mar; 12(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 11231870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cervical cancer knowledge and screening in Accra, Ghana.
Adanu RM
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2002; 11(6):487-8. PubMed ID: 12225621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Characteristics of subgroups of attenders and non-attenders in an organised screening programme for cervical cancer.
Larsen LP; Olesen F
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 8946308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Women's experiences at cervical screening.
Crombie IK; Orbell S; Johnston G; Robertson AJ; Kenicer M
Scott Med J; 1995 Jun; 40(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 7569870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.
Pierce M; Lundy S; Palanisamy A; Winning S; King J
BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):160-2. PubMed ID: 2504359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. How complete can cervical screening be? The outcome of a call screening programme for women aged 20-60 years in Perth and Kinross.
Robertson AJ; Reid GS; Stoker CA; Bissett C; Waugh N; Fenton I; Rowan J; Halkerston R
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 2130997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Women's views of the cervical smear test: implications for nursing practice--women who have not had a smear test.
McKie L
J Adv Nurs; 1993 Jun; 18(6):972-9. PubMed ID: 8320394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility.
Standing P; Mercer S
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):883-6. PubMed ID: 6434128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cervical screening of Arabic-speaking women in Australian general practice.
Lesjak M; Ward J; Rissel C
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 9275270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract.
Reid GS; Robertson AJ; Bissett C; Smith J; Waugh N; Halkerston R
BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6800):447-50. PubMed ID: 1912838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Promotion of cervical screening uptake by health visitor follow-up of women who repeatedly failed to attend.
Campbell H; MacDonald S; McKiernan M
J Public Health Med; 1996 Mar; 18(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 8785082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The impact of knowledge, perceived barriers and perceptions of risk on attendance for a routine cervical smear.
Walsh JC
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2006 Dec; 11(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 17484195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Increasing the uptake of cervical screening programmes.
Gannon M; Dowling M
Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):1280-4. PubMed ID: 19043332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.
Shroff KJ; Corrigan AM; Bosher M; Edmonds MP; Sacks D; Coleman DV
BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6659):1317-8. PubMed ID: 3144375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
