These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19174653)

  • 1. Should quality improvement projects require IRB approval?
    Weiserbs KF; Lyutic L; Weinberg J
    Acad Med; 2009 Feb; 84(2):153. PubMed ID: 19174653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Which projects should be submitted to the regional ethics committee?].
    Lekven J; Gisvold SE; Hardang J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Nov; 132(21):2366-7. PubMed ID: 23160584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical issues surrounding quality improvement activities: a review.
    Wise LC
    J Nurs Adm; 2007 Jun; 37(6):272-8. PubMed ID: 17563519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. OHRP action shuts down quality improvement research in Michigan.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2008 Mar; 15(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 18447247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality improvement projects: inaction presents the greatest risk.
    Stimler C
    Arch Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 163(21):2648-9; author reply 2649. PubMed ID: 14638567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethics of quality improvement research.
    Siegel MD; Alfano SL
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):791-2. PubMed ID: 19325394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course.
    Maxwell DJ; Kaye KI
    Med J Aust; 2004 Oct; 181(8):460; discussion 460-1. PubMed ID: 15612087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards.
    Tsan MF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Jul; 14(3):187-189. PubMed ID: 30296884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overseeing quality improvement.
    Wells RJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(4):6-7; author reply 7-8. PubMed ID: 17847187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overseeing quality improvement.
    Hauswald M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(4):6; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 17844911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality assurance or research?].
    Utne PH; Thelle DS
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2385. PubMed ID: 19935943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethics and quality improvement. Quality care and ethical principles cannot be separated when considering quality improvement activities.
    Nelson WA; Gardent PB
    Healthc Exec; 2008; 23(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 18724589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality improvement or research? The ethics of hospital project oversight.
    Morris PE; Dracup K
    Am J Crit Care; 2007 Sep; 16(5):424-6. PubMed ID: 17724233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases.
    Dokholyan RS; Muhlbaier LH; Falletta JM; Jacobs JP; Shahian D; Haan CK; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2009 Jun; 157(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 19464406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anonymous self-evaluation of performance by ethics board members: a pilot study.
    Feldman JA; Rebholz CM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Mar; 4(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19382879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research ethics boards: no data on quality of for-profit or non-profit IRBs.
    Shamoo AE; Woeckner E
    PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e459; author reply e460, e471. PubMed ID: 17076572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality improvement as research: unintended consequences and the slippery slope.
    Wise LC
    J Nurs Adm; 2006 Sep; 36(9):383; author reply 384. PubMed ID: 16969246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When is institutional review board approval necessary for quality improvement projects?
    Cacchione PZ
    Clin Nurs Res; 2011 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 21205910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IRB policies regarding finder's fees and role conflicts in recruiting research participants.
    Wolf LE
    IRB; 2009; 31(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19241735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.