These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19174653)

  • 21. Coast IRB hits treacherous waters.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2009 May; 15(5):470. PubMed ID: 19424193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recommendations for the ethical conduct of quality improvement.
    Fox E; Tulsky JA
    J Clin Ethics; 2005; 16(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15915847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality improvement or research? A report from the trenches.
    Wise L
    Am J Crit Care; 2008 Mar; 17(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 18310642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. IRB approval: consideration of power is essential for ethical approval.
    Herbison P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(4):397. PubMed ID: 15977255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who reviews the projects of unaffiliated researchers for ethics? A case study from Alberta.
    O'Beirne M; Stingl M; Hayward S
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 17695629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Roles and actions of IRBs as it relates to the process of drug and device development.
    Silverstein JH; Bienstock C
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2008; 75(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 18306252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why we need ethical oversight of quality improvement projects.
    Perneger TV
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Oct; 16(5):343-4. PubMed ID: 15375092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do quality improvement projects require IRB approval?
    Gautham KS; Pearlman S
    J Perinatol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):1209-1212. PubMed ID: 33758391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Research vs. public health practice: when does a study require IRB review?
    Amoroso PJ; Middaugh JP
    Prev Med; 2003 Feb; 36(2):250-3. PubMed ID: 12591001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle course.
    Dickson HG
    Med J Aust; 2004 Oct; 181(8):459-60; discussion 460. PubMed ID: 15487969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. IRB approval: needed but insufficient.
    Daneshgari F
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):151. PubMed ID: 15690357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Values are the bottom line for health care.
    Johnson S
    Mich Health Hosp; 2003; 39(5):46. PubMed ID: 14503037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Commentary: Can we facilitate the ethical approval of international observational studies?
    Cuttini M; Saracci R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1108-9. PubMed ID: 19584126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring mechanisms for quality assurance in primary care systems in transition: test of a new instrument in Slovenia and Uzbekistan.
    Kringos DS; Boerma W; Pellny M
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 19622267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Training and dissemination of good practices for research ethics committees: standardization, harmonization and collaboration.
    Glasa J
    Med Etika Bioet; 2005; 12(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 16607712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Scientific ethics committees and scientific quality--two incompatible dimensions?].
    Poulsen HD; Aggernaes KH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(41):5516. PubMed ID: 11068532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Model for improvement - Part Two: Measurement and feedback for quality improvement efforts.
    Randolph G; Esporas M; Provost L; Massie S; Bundy DG
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 56(4):779-98. PubMed ID: 19660627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Quality assurance or research].
    Riis P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Nov; 154(47):3343. PubMed ID: 1462442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving quality improvement: a methodologic framework for evaluating effectiveness of surgical quality improvement.
    Kao LS; Lally KP; Thomas EJ; Tyson JE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 19476799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
    Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.