These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Recommendations for the ethical conduct of quality improvement. Fox E; Tulsky JA J Clin Ethics; 2005; 16(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15915847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality improvement or research? A report from the trenches. Wise L Am J Crit Care; 2008 Mar; 17(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 18310642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. IRB approval: consideration of power is essential for ethical approval. Herbison P Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(4):397. PubMed ID: 15977255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Who reviews the projects of unaffiliated researchers for ethics? A case study from Alberta. O'Beirne M; Stingl M; Hayward S Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 17695629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Roles and actions of IRBs as it relates to the process of drug and device development. Silverstein JH; Bienstock C Mt Sinai J Med; 2008; 75(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 18306252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Why we need ethical oversight of quality improvement projects. Perneger TV Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Oct; 16(5):343-4. PubMed ID: 15375092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Research vs. public health practice: when does a study require IRB review? Amoroso PJ; Middaugh JP Prev Med; 2003 Feb; 36(2):250-3. PubMed ID: 12591001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. IRB approval: needed but insufficient. Daneshgari F Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):151. PubMed ID: 15690357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Values are the bottom line for health care. Johnson S Mich Health Hosp; 2003; 39(5):46. PubMed ID: 14503037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Commentary: Can we facilitate the ethical approval of international observational studies? Cuttini M; Saracci R Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1108-9. PubMed ID: 19584126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Measuring mechanisms for quality assurance in primary care systems in transition: test of a new instrument in Slovenia and Uzbekistan. Kringos DS; Boerma W; Pellny M Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 19622267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Training and dissemination of good practices for research ethics committees: standardization, harmonization and collaboration. Glasa J Med Etika Bioet; 2005; 12(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 16607712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]