113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19175083)
21. Personalization of X-Ray Tube Motion in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Virtual Defrise Phantoms.
Acciavatti RJ; Barufaldi B; Vent TL; Wileyto EP; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2019 Feb; 10948():. PubMed ID: 38106641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of Volume Overestimation Artifacts in the Breast Outline Segmentation in Tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Vent TL; Bakic PR; Reiser I; Sechopoulos I; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2018 Feb; 10573():. PubMed ID: 38327670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Proposing a New Velocity Profile for Continuous X-Ray Tube Motion in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2013 Feb; 8668():. PubMed ID: 38800605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and Evaluation of the Fourier Spectral Distortion Metric.
Vent TL; Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 40(3):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 33326378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Achieving Isotropic Super-Resolution with a Non-Isocentric Acquisition Geometry in a Next-Generation Tomosynthesis System.
Acciavatti RJ; Choi CJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12031():. PubMed ID: 37692411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Proposing Rapid Source Pulsing for Improved Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Wileyto EP; Noël PB; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 Feb; 11312():. PubMed ID: 37927528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An Experimental Platform for Tomographic Reconstruction of Tissue Images in Brightfield Microscopy.
Koudounas P; Koniaris E; Manolis I; Asvestas P; Kostopoulos S; Cavouras D; Glotsos D
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Nov; 23(23):. PubMed ID: 38067718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modulation transfer function of digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of various edge devices.
Shirato T; Doryo K; Yamada S; Ozaki Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38780698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. PSF and MTF from a bar pattern in digital mammography.
Lozano R; Rojo Navarrete D; Martínez Gómez LC; Ramón García C
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38821042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Compositional-prior-guided image reconstruction algorithm for multi-modality imaging.
Fang Q; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Boas DA
Biomed Opt Express; 2010 Jul; 1(1):223-235. PubMed ID: 21258460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Limitations of the Conventional System Design and Strategies for Optimization.
Acciavatti RJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Wileyto EP; Noël PB; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 May; 11513():. PubMed ID: 37842133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Point spread function modeling for photoacoustic tomography - I: three-dimensional detection geometries.
Zhang C; Tan Z; Tian C
Opt Express; 2024 Jan; 32(2):1063-1087. PubMed ID: 38297668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.
Ma AK; Darambara DG; Stewart A; Gunn S; Bullard E
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Image Quality Enhancement for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: High-Density Object Artifact Reduction.
Shen E; Li C; Zhao K; Yuan J; Carson P
J Imaging Inform Med; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38536588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of Tomosynthesis Acquisition on 3D Segmentations of Breast Outline and Adipose/Dense Tissue with AI: A Simulation-Based Study.
Barufaldi B; Gomes J; Rego TGD; Malheiros Y; Filho TMS; Borges LR; Acciavatti RJ; Surti S; Maidment ADA
Tomography; 2023 Jul; 9(4):1303-1314. PubMed ID: 37489471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of lesion detection and conspicuity between narrow-angle and wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis for dense and non-dense breasts.
Huang H; Scaduto D; Plaunova A; Rinaldi K; Fisher PR; Zhao W
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 2):S22407. PubMed ID: 37197744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Visual adaptation to medical images: a comparison of digital mammography and tomosynthesis.
Parthasarathy MK; Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abbey CK; Webster MA
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 1):S11909. PubMed ID: 37114188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Variation in digital breast tomosynthesis image quality at differing heights above the detector.
Davidson R; Al Khalifah K; Zhou A
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Jun; 69(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 34957671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: an Overview.
Dhamija E; Gulati M; Deo SVS; Gogia A; Hari S
Indian J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 12(2):315-329. PubMed ID: 34295076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Assessment of imaging performance of digital breast tomosynthesis based on systematic simulation].
Deng Y; Zhu M; Li S; Wang Y; Gao Y; Ma J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Jun; 41(6):898-908. PubMed ID: 34238743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
