BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19175084)

  • 1. Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.
    Nie K; Chen JH; Chan S; Chau MK; Yu HJ; Bahri S; Tseng T; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5253-62. PubMed ID: 19175084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.
    Lin M; Chan S; Chen JH; Chang D; Nie K; Chen ST; Lin CJ; Shih TC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 21361169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI.
    Nie K; Chang D; Chen JH; Hsu CC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 20175484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation and volumetric density estimation in breast MRI using an atlas-aided fuzzy C-means method.
    Wu S; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122302. PubMed ID: 24320533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy C-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography.
    Keller B; Nathan D; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee J; Conant E; Kontos D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 3):562-9. PubMed ID: 22003744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast density analysis for whole breast ultrasound images.
    Chen JH; Huang CS; Chien KC; Takada E; Moon WK; Wu JH; Cho N; Wang YF; Chang RF
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4933-43. PubMed ID: 19994502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Edge intensity normalization as a bias field correction during balloon snake segmentation of breast MRI.
    Hill A; Mehnert A; Crozier S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3040-3. PubMed ID: 19163347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.
    Ding H; Johnson T; Lin M; Le HQ; Ducote JL; Su MY; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122305. PubMed ID: 24320536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.
    Hruska CB; Geske JR; Swanson TN; Mammel AN; Lake DS; Manduca A; Conners AL; Whaley DH; Scott CG; Carter RE; Rhodes DJ; O'Connor MK; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):46. PubMed ID: 29871661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
    Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI.
    Nie K; Chang D; Chen JH; Shih TC; Hsu CC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 20175485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opportunistic Breast Density Assessment in Women Receiving Low-dose Chest Computed Tomography Screening.
    Chen JH; Chan S; Lu NH; Li Y; Tsai YC; Huang PY; Chang CJ; Su MY
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1154-61. PubMed ID: 27283069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort.
    Klifa C; Carballido-Gamio J; Wilmes L; Laprie A; Shepherd J; Gibbs J; Fan B; Noworolski S; Hylton N
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19631485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A level set based framework for quantitative evaluation of breast tissue density from MRI data.
    Ivanovska T; Laqua R; Wang L; Liebscher V; Völzke H; Hegenscheid K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112709. PubMed ID: 25422942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Template-based automatic breast segmentation on MRI by excluding the chest region.
    Lin M; Chen JH; Wang X; Chan S; Chen S; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122301. PubMed ID: 24320532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully automated segmentation of whole breast using dynamic programming in dynamic contrast enhanced MR images.
    Jiang L; Hu X; Xiao Q; Gu Y; Li Q
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2400-2414. PubMed ID: 28375584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.