These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19175087)

  • 1. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.
    Ma AK; Darambara DG; Stewart A; Gunn S; Bullard E
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography System with Different Anode-Filter Combinations Using MCNP Code.
    Gholamkar L; Mowlavi AA; Sadeghi M; Athari M
    Iran J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(4):e36484. PubMed ID: 27895876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. COMPARISON OF SPECTRA AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE WITH TUBE VOLTAGES USED IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS FROM SIMULATED, METROLOGICAL AND CLINICAL CASES.
    da Silveira Gatto LB; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos P; Magalhaes LAG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 33320943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
    Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
    Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of spectra and mean glandular dose (MGD) with tube voltage used in digital mammography for simulated, metrological and clinical cases.
    Barbosa da Silveira Gatto L; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos PC; Goncalves Magalhaes LA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Oct; 176():109862. PubMed ID: 34385091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
    Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
    Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model.
    Carton AK; Ullberg C; Lindman K; Acciavatti R; Francke T; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5896-907. PubMed ID: 21158302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
    Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fedon C; Rabin C; Caballo M; Diaz O; García E; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; González-Sprinberg GA; Sechopoulos I
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30524034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.