These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19175861)

  • 1. Sex differences in visual attention to sexually explicit videos: a preliminary study.
    Tsujimura A; Miyagawa Y; Takada S; Matsuoka Y; Takao T; Hirai T; Matsushita M; Nonomura N; Okuyama A
    J Sex Med; 2009 Apr; 6(4):1011-1017. PubMed ID: 19175861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Pattern of Sexual Interest of Female-to-Male Transsexual Persons With Gender Identity Disorder Does Not Resemble That of Biological Men: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Tsujimura A; Kiuchi H; Soda T; Takezawa K; Fukuhara S; Takao T; Sekiguchi Y; Iwasa A; Nonomura N; Miyagawa Y
    Sex Med; 2017 Sep; 5(3):e169-e174. PubMed ID: 28823313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Mostly Heterosexuals.
    Morandini JS; Veldre A; Holcombe AO; Hsu K; Lykins A; Bailey JM; Dar-Nimrod I
    Arch Sex Behav; 2019 Jul; 48(5):1371-1385. PubMed ID: 31144215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli.
    Lykins AD; Meana M; Strauss GP
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Apr; 37(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 17668312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.
    Rupp HA; Wallen K
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Jun; 38(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 18719987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual attention to erotic images in women reporting pain with intercourse.
    Lykins AD; Meana M; Minimi J
    J Sex Res; 2011 Jan; 48(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 20077272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential gaze behavior towards sexually preferred and non-preferred human figures.
    Hall C; Hogue T; Guo K
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 20967669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender Differences in the Automatic Attention to Romantic Vs Sexually Explicit Stimuli.
    Carvalho J; Czop O; Rocha M; Nobre P; Soares S
    J Sex Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 30078461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual attention and sexual arousal in women with and without sexual dysfunction.
    Velten J; Milani S; Margraf J; Brotto LA
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Sep; 144():103915. PubMed ID: 34174705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: an eye-tracking study in men and women.
    Rupp HA; Wallen K
    Horm Behav; 2007 Apr; 51(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 17362952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Women With Clinical, Subclinical, and Normal Sexual Functioning: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Velten J; Milani S; Margraf J; Brotto LA
    J Sex Med; 2021 Jan; 18(1):144-155. PubMed ID: 33281077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women.
    Israel E; Strassberg DS
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Aug; 38(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 17943432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Woman's Body (Not the Man's One) Is Used to Evaluate Sexual Desire: An Eye-Tracking Study of Automatic Visual Attention.
    Bolmont M; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Boisgontier MP; Cheval B
    J Sex Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 30770068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology.
    Lykins AD; Meana M; Kambe G
    Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Oct; 35(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 17031585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation between sexual interest and personality characteristics in men: an eye-tracking study.
    Tsujimura A; Miyagawa Y; Takada S; Nagahara A; Matsuoka Y; Takao T; Nakayama J; Matsushita M; Nonomura N; Okuyama A
    Int J Impot Res; 2010; 22(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 20182432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK; Santtila P; Hyönä J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1439-51. PubMed ID: 22402995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of Positive Versus Negative Mood States on Attentional Processes During Exposure to Erotica.
    Carvalho J; Pereira R; Barreto D; Nobre PJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 27734171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
    Evitts P; Gallop R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in Visual Attention Patterns to Sexually Mature and Immature Stimuli Between Heterosexual Sexual Offenders, Nonsexual Offenders, and Nonoffending Men.
    Vásquez Amézquita M; Leongoméz JD; Seto MC; Salvador A
    J Sex Res; 2019 Feb; 56(2):213-228. PubMed ID: 30198780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli.
    Hamann S; Herman RA; Nolan CL; Wallen K
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 7(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 15004563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.