271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19176154)
1. [Why was my article refused?].
Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Jan; 171(5):303. PubMed ID: 19176154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Registration of clinical trials--results included now!].
Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1535. PubMed ID: 18454920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Suggesting reviewers.
Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
Eklund J
Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bad papers by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [What does the Tidsskriftet's editorial committee do?].
Rørtveit G; Staff A; Schem BC; Busund LT; Nakken KO; Walstad M; Dale O; Vigen T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Jan; 129(3):175. PubMed ID: 19180158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Five direct questions to Josef Milerad concerning credibility].
Holmgren PG
Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):346, 349. PubMed ID: 12607383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors].
Milerad J
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 21-27; 105(21):1560-1. PubMed ID: 18574991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Freedom of expression and editorial independence: Four firings and a Kafkanian process].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18454921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [What should a medical journal's purpose be--facts or sponsored entertainment?].
Milerad J
Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(50):5062-3. PubMed ID: 12572295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research.
Marchant S
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial policies and publication bias: the importance of negative studies.
Sridharan L; Greenland P
Arch Intern Med; 2009 Jun; 169(11):1022-3. PubMed ID: 19506169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The editorial process].
Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Nov; 170(48):3933. PubMed ID: 19087728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [It smells!].
Bundgaard S
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 12553101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review of NZMJ articles: issues raised after publication of the viewpoint article on Janet Frame.
Frizelle FA
N Z Med J; 2007 Oct; 120(1264):U2788; discussion U2787. PubMed ID: 17972995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [It smells! 2].
Engberg M; Christensen B; Karlsmose B; Lauritzen T; Lous J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(11):1148-9. PubMed ID: 12677997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Should the Ugeskrift take in secondary publications without independent peer reviews?].
Hjøllund NH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug; 168(33):2687; author reply 2687. PubMed ID: 16953547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [That is why your article was rejected].
Johansen K
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Mar; 171(12):1015; author reply 1015. PubMed ID: 19301477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Declaration of possible conflict of interest--is it reliable?].
Johansson M
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Feb; 168(9):925; author reply 925-8. PubMed ID: 16513063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
