293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19176237)
1. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: Development of a technique.
Magrina JF; Kho R; Montero RP; Magtibay PM; Pawlina W
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 19157527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
Shafer A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S18-23. PubMed ID: 18771796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Pikaart DP; Holloway RW; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; Ortiz BH; Denardis SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 17692367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Malpica A; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 19944451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience.
Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital.
Sert MB; Abeler V
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 21353294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic radical hysterectomy.
Fanning J; Fenton B; Purohit M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):649.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18538146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.
Zakashansky K; Bradley WH; Chuang L; Rahaman J; Dottino P
Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Dec; 76(6):567-76. PubMed ID: 20014423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
