147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19176551)
41. Factors affecting accuracy of estimated effective number of chromosome segments for numerically small breeds.
Marjanovic J; Calus MPL
J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Mar; 138(2):151-160. PubMed ID: 33040409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures.
Akbarpour T; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Shadparvar AA
Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 Jan; 296(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 32995954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality.
Bermann M; Legarra A; Hollifield MK; Masuda Y; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Jan; 138(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 32985749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of Different Strategies for Exploiting Genomic Selection in Perennial Ryegrass Breeding Programs.
Esfandyari H; Fè D; Tessema BB; Janss LL; Jensen J
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3783-3795. PubMed ID: 32819970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Assessment of genomic prediction accuracy using different selection and evaluation approaches in a simulated Korean beef cattle population.
Nwogwugwu CP; Kim Y; Choi H; Lee JH; Lee SH
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 33(12):1912-1921. PubMed ID: 32819072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Genotyping-free parentage assignment using RAD-seq reads.
Chen SY; Li C; Luo Z; Li X; Gan J; Jia X; Lai SJ; Wang W
Ecol Evol; 2020 Jul; 10(14):7783-7791. PubMed ID: 32760564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Use of the Multivariate Discriminant Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Studies in Cattle.
Manca E; Cesarani A; Gaspa G; Sorbolini S; Macciotta NPP; Dimauro C
Animals (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 32751408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.
Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jul; 52(1):42. PubMed ID: 32727349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.
Lourenco D; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Misztal I
Genes (Basel); 2020 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 32674271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prediction of breeding values for group-recorded traits including genomic information and an individually recorded correlated trait.
Ma X; Christensen OF; Gao H; Huang R; Nielsen B; Madsen P; Jensen J; Ostersen T; Li P; Shirali M; Su G
Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Jan; 126(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 32665691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Long-Term Evaluation of Breeding Scheme Alternatives for Endangered Honeybee Subspecies.
Plate M; Bernstein R; Hoppe A; Bienefeld K
Insects; 2020 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 32629773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods.
Alves AAC; da Costa RM; Bresolin T; Fernandes Júnior GA; Espigolan R; Ribeiro AMF; Carvalheiro R; de Albuquerque LG
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32474602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for prediction of genotypic values.
van Bergen GHH; Duenk P; Albers CA; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Kappen HJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):26. PubMed ID: 32414320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Genomic Breeding Programs Realize Larger Benefits by Cooperation in the Presence of Genotype × Environment Interaction Than Conventional Breeding Programs.
Cao L; Liu H; Mulder HA; Henryon M; Thomasen JR; Kargo M; Sørensen AC
Front Genet; 2020; 11():251. PubMed ID: 32373152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparing Alternative Single-Step GBLUP Approaches and Training Population Designs for Genomic Evaluation of Crossbred Animals.
Alvarenga AB; Veroneze R; Oliveira HR; Marques DBD; Lopes PS; Silva FF; Brito LF
Front Genet; 2020; 11():263. PubMed ID: 32328083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Current status of genomic evaluation.
Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. MoBPS - Modular Breeding Program Simulator.
Pook T; Schlather M; Simianer H
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jun; 10(6):1915-1918. PubMed ID: 32229505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of errors in pedigree on the accuracy of estimated breeding value for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle.
Nwogwugwu CP; Kim Y; Chung YJ; Jang SB; Roh SH; Kim S; Lee JH; Choi TJ; Lee SH
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Jul; 33(7):1057-1067. PubMed ID: 32054237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. SeqBreed: a python tool to evaluate genomic prediction in complex scenarios.
Pérez-Enciso M; Ramírez-Ayala LC; Zingaretti LM
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):7. PubMed ID: 32039696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
