BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19177273)

  • 1. Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations.
    Thorne PS; Ansley AC; Perry SS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Apr; 6(4):211-20. PubMed ID: 19177273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality-assured measurements of animal building emissions: particulate matter concentrations.
    Heber AJ; Lim TT; Ni JQ; Tao PC; Schmidt AM; Koziel JA; Hoff SJ; Jacobson LD; Zhang Y; Baughman GB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12):1642-8. PubMed ID: 17195483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emissions of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and odor before, during, and after slurry removal from a deep-pit swine finisher.
    Hoff SJ; Bundy DS; Nelson MA; Zelle BC; Jacobson LD; Heber AJ; Ni J; Zhang Y; Koziel JA; Beasley DB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 May; 56(5):581-90. PubMed ID: 16739794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of bioaerosols released from swine farms using conventional and alternative waste treatment and management technologies.
    Ko G; Simmons OD; Likirdopulos CA; Worley-Davis L; Williams M; Sobsey MD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Dec; 42(23):8849-57. PubMed ID: 19192808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of production systems on swine confinement buildings bioaerosols.
    Létourneau V; Nehmé B; Mériaux A; Massé D; Duchaine C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19953413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrogen sulfide concentrations at three middle schools near industrial livestock facilities.
    Guidry VT; Kinlaw AC; Johnston J; Hall D; Wing S
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 27(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 27094997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endotoxin levels at Swine farms using different waste treatment and management technologies.
    Ko G; Simmons Iii OD; Likirdopulos CA; Worley-Davis L; Williams CM; Sobsey MD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3442-8. PubMed ID: 20356077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of air quality at neighbor residences in the vicinity of swine production facilities.
    Donham KJ; Lee JA; Thu K; Reynolds SJ
    J Agromedicine; 2006; 11(3-4):15-24. PubMed ID: 19274894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses.
    Chang CW; Chung H; Huang CF; Su HJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Aug; 45(6):457-65. PubMed ID: 11513795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial dynamics and climatic interactions in pig sheds: Insights into airborne microbes and particulate matter concentrations.
    Katwal S; Singh Y; Bedi JS; Chandra M; Honparkhe M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):511. PubMed ID: 38703303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Concentration and Size Distribution of Bioaerosols in Indoor Environment of University Dormitory During the Plum Rain Period].
    Liu T; Li L; Zhang JQ; Zhan CL; Liu HX; Zheng JR; Yao RZ; Cao JJ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2016 Apr; 37(4):1256-63. PubMed ID: 27548944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution characteristics of bioaerosols inside pig houses and the respiratory tract of pigs.
    Tang Q; Huang K; Liu J; Jin X; Li C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Apr; 212():112006. PubMed ID: 33556810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passive monitors to measure hydrogen sulfide near concentrated animal feeding operations.
    Pavilonis BT; O'Shaughnessy PT; Altmaier R; Metwali N; Thorne PS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Jun; 15(6):1271-8. PubMed ID: 23681048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Airborne endotoxin concentrations at a large open-lot dairy in southern idaho.
    Dungan RS; Leytem AB
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):1919-23. PubMed ID: 19643758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential air toxics hot spots in truck terminals and cabs.
    Smith TJ; Davis ME; Hart JE; Blicharz A; Laden F; Garshick E;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Dec; (172):5-82. PubMed ID: 23409510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Gestation Pens Versus Stalls and Wet Versus Dry Feed on Air Contaminants in Swine Production.
    Raynor PC; Engelman S; Murphy D; Ramachandran G; Bender JB; Alexander BH
    J Agromedicine; 2018; 23(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 28976266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 2. Airborne pollutants.
    Banhazi TM; Seedorf J; Rutley DL; Pitchford WS
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 18376533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during winter and summer.
    Honeyman MS; Harmon JD
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1663-70. PubMed ID: 12854801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of particle-borne odorants emitted from concentrated animal feeding operations.
    Yang X; Lorjaroenphon Y; Cadwallader KR; Wang X; Zhang Y; Lee J
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():322-33. PubMed ID: 24863138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of workers' exposure to bioaerosols in a French cheese factory.
    Simon X; Duquenne P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Jul; 58(6):677-92. PubMed ID: 24812257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.