These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19177369)

  • 1. Mechanical unfolding of covalently linked GroES: evidence of structural subunit intermediates.
    Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Protein Sci; 2009 Jan; 18(1):252-7. PubMed ID: 19177369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural stability of covalently linked GroES heptamer: advantages in the formation of oligomeric structure.
    Sakane I; Hongo K; Motojima F; Murayama S; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Apr; 367(4):1171-85. PubMed ID: 17303164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prying open single GroES ring complexes by force reveals cooperativity across domains.
    Ikeda-Kobayashi A; Taniguchi Y; Brockwell DJ; Paci E; Kawakami M
    Biophys J; 2012 Apr; 102(8):1961-8. PubMed ID: 22768953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular chaperone GroEL/ES: unfolding and refolding processes.
    Ryabova NA; Marchenkov VV; Marchenkova SY; Kotova NV; Semisotnov GV
    Biochemistry (Mosc); 2013 Dec; 78(13):1405-14. PubMed ID: 24490731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural stability of oligomeric chaperonin 10: the role of two beta-strands at the N and C termini in structural stabilization.
    Sakane I; Ikeda M; Matsumoto C; Higurashi T; Inoue K; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Dec; 344(4):1123-33. PubMed ID: 15544816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural stability and solution structure of chaperonin GroES heptamer studied by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering.
    Higurashi T; Hiragi Y; Ichimura K; Seki Y; Soda K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    J Mol Biol; 2003 Oct; 333(3):605-20. PubMed ID: 14556748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system.
    Illingworth M; Salisbury J; Li W; Lin D; Chen L
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26271593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unfolding and refolding of Escherichia coli chaperonin GroES is expressed by a three-state model.
    Higurashi T; Nosaka K; Mizobata T; Nagai J; Kawata Y
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Aug; 291(3):703-13. PubMed ID: 10448048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct Stabilities of the Structurally Homologous Heptameric Co-Chaperonins GroES and gp31.
    Dyachenko A; Tamara S; Heck AJR
    J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2019 Jan; 30(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29736602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GroES co-chaperonin small-angle X-ray scattering study shows ring orifice increase in solution.
    Timchenko AA; Melnik BS; Kihara H; Kimura K; Semisotnov GV
    FEBS Lett; 2000 Apr; 471(2-3):211-4. PubMed ID: 10767425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Productive folding of a tethered protein in the chaperonin GroEL-GroES cage.
    Motojima F; Yoshida M
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 26325470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Limited Trypsinolysis of GroES: The Effect on the Interaction with GroEL and Assembly In Vitro].
    Marchenkov VV; Kotova NV; Muranova TA; Semisotnov GV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2018; 52(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 29512639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.
    Liu H; Kovács E; Lund PA
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Jul; 583(14):2365-71. PubMed ID: 19545569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The H/D-exchange kinetics of the Escherichia coli co-chaperonin GroES studied by 2D NMR and DMSO-quenched exchange methods.
    Chandak MS; Nakamura T; Makabe K; Takenaka T; Mukaiyama A; Chaudhuri TK; Kato K; Kuwajima K
    J Mol Biol; 2013 Jul; 425(14):2541-60. PubMed ID: 23583779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High resolution surface structure of E. coli GroES oligomer by atomic force microscopy.
    Mou J; Czajkowsky DM; Sheng SJ; Ho R; Shao Z
    FEBS Lett; 1996 Feb; 381(1-2):161-4. PubMed ID: 8641429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
    Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The structural stability of the co-chaperonin GroES.
    Boudker O; Todd MJ; Freire E
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Oct; 272(5):770-9. PubMed ID: 9368656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Yoshida M; Taguchi H
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(35):23774-81. PubMed ID: 18567584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TEM and STEM-EDS evaluation of metal nanoparticle encapsulation in GroEL/GroES complexes according to the reaction mechanism of chaperonin.
    Yoda H; Koike-Takeshita A
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2021 Jun; 70(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 33173948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Substrate protein dependence of GroEL-GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging.
    Noshiro D; Ando T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Jun; 373(1749):. PubMed ID: 29735734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.