BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19179243)

  • 1. Multislice scanners and radiation dose.
    Mahesh M; Hevezi JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19179243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia.
    Yates SJ; Pike LC; Goldstone KE
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):472-8. PubMed ID: 15151967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [French legislation and radiation dose control in paediatric computed tomography].
    Brisse H; Sirinelli D;
    Arch Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 13(6):788-90. PubMed ID: 16697579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners.
    Raman SP; Johnson PT; Deshmukh S; Mahesh M; Grant KL; Fishman EK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 23290672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT equipment and performance issues: radiation protection 162.
    Edyvean S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23188810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT radiation dose and image quality.
    Payne JT
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols.
    Heggie JC; Kay JK; Lee WK
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 16732832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiology. Second thoughts about CT imaging.
    Schenkman L
    Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6020):1002-4. PubMed ID: 21350139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FDA speaks out on the Steris System 1 and on CT dose risks--ECRI institute responds.
    Health Devices; 2010 Jan; 39(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 20143661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing body CT radiation dose: beyond just changing the numbers.
    Hara AK; Wellnitz CV; Paden RG; Pavlicek W; Sahani DV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 23789656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues.
    Frush DP; Applegate K
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 17411538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control.
    Kalra MK; Naz N; Rizzo SM; Blake MA
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2005; 34(5):171-81. PubMed ID: 16129235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations in radiation dose between the same model of multislice CT scanner at different hospitals.
    Koller CJ; Eatough JP; Bettridge A
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Nov; 76(911):798-802. PubMed ID: 14623781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography: important considerations for pediatric patients.
    Frush DP
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2005 Sep; 2(5):567-75. PubMed ID: 16293068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Relation of the quality coefficient and linear transmission of energy as new standards of radiation safety].
    Avetisov GM; Gubin AT; Keirim-Markus IB; Lystsov VN; Obaturov GM
    Gig Sanit; 1988 Oct; (10):32-6. PubMed ID: 3234777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic reference levels for X-ray examinations: update 2010].
    Veit R; Guggenberger R; Nosske D; Brix G
    Radiologe; 2010 Oct; 50(10):907-12. PubMed ID: 20890589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations.
    Donnelly LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):655-7. PubMed ID: 15671393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Technical progress in medical radiology: benefit or misfortune?].
    Candardjis G
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1988 Nov; 108(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 3206051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting a new PET/CT system.
    Madsen MT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 May; 1(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 17411602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.