BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19179917)

  • 1. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices: a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome.
    Jiya T; Smit T; Deddens J; Mullender M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 19179917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.
    Jiya TU; Smit T; van Royen BJ; Mullender M
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 20842388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic, histologic, and chemical evaluation of bioresorbable 70/30 poly-L-lactide-CO-D, L-lactide interbody fusion cages in a goat model.
    Krijnen MR; Mullender MG; Smit TH; Everts V; Wuisman PI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):1559-67. PubMed ID: 16778688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteolysis following resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D, L-lactide PLIF cage use: a review of cases.
    Frost A; Bagouri E; Brown M; Jasani V
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Mar; 21(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 21881864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.
    Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kim MC; Chung HT; Cho JL; Kim DJ; Chung NS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23529151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
    Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol.
    Kersten RF; van Gaalen SM; Arts MP; Roes KC; de Gast A; Corbin TP; Öner FC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():57. PubMed ID: 24568365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
    Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
    Niu CC; Liao JC; Chen WJ; Chen LH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):310-6. PubMed ID: 20124907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.
    Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
    Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using a titanium cylindrical threaded fusion device.
    Sasso RC; Kitchel SH; Dawson EG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):113-22; discussion 121-2. PubMed ID: 14722400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the PEEK cage and an autologous cage made from the lumbar spinous process and laminae in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lin B; Yu H; Chen Z; Huang Z; Zhang W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Aug; 17(1):374. PubMed ID: 27577978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fusion rate and clinical results between CaO-SiO
    Lee JH; Kong CB; Yang JJ; Shim HJ; Koo KH; Kim J; Lee CK; Chang BS
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 27498334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis: unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pedicle screws and 2 cages.
    Aoki Y; Yamagata M; Ikeda Y; Nakajima F; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K; Nakajima A; Toyone T; Orita S; Takahashi K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Aug; 17(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 22702892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
    Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries.
    Ni J; Zheng Y; Liu N; Wang X; Fang X; Phukan R; Wood KB
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 25618451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.