These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19180661)

  • 1. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis.
    Garcia JA; Agostoni P; Green NE; Maddux JT; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Hansgen A; Wink O; Movassaghi B; Groves BM; Van Den Heuvel P; Verheye S; Van Langenhove G; Vermeersch P; Van den Branden F; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 73(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 19180661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography.
    Klein AJ; Garcia JA; Hudson PA; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Wink O; Hattler B; Tsai TT; Chen SY; Hansgen A; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 20853352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Maddux JT; Wink O; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Liao R; Strzelczyk J; Chen SY; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jun; 62(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15170705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Contrast Volume, Radiation Dose, Fluoroscopy Time, and Procedure Time in Previously Published Studies of Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography.
    Loomba RS; Rios R; Buelow M; Eagam M; Aggarwal S; Arora RR
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 116(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 25983128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography.
    Jin ZG; Bai R; Li Y; Yang Y; Han W; Zhao Q; Zhang L; Liu HL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31628576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Rotational coronary angiography].
    Smida W; Sidéris G; Stratiev V; Logeart D; Ouadhour A; Tarragano F; Bonnevie L; Azancot I; Henry P
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2007 Nov; 100(11):895-900. PubMed ID: 18209689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional rotational X-ray acquisition technique is reducing patients' cancer risk in coronary angiography.
    Eloot L; Bacher K; Steenbeke F; Drieghe B; Gheeraert P; Taeymans Y; Thierens H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E419-27. PubMed ID: 23420705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Around the heart in 4 seconds.
    Tommaso CL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 73(6):762. PubMed ID: 19367632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory.
    Garcia JA; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Hansgen A; Wink O; Movassaghi B; Klein AJ; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 17295325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector.
    Akhtar M; Vakharia KT; Mishell J; Gera A; Ports TA; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Sep; 66(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16082684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized comparison between rotational and standard coronary angiography.
    Rigattieri S; Ghini AS; Silvestri P; Tommasino A; Ferraiuolo G; Palamara A; Loschiavo P
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2005 Feb; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15788975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in.
    Liu HL; Jin ZG; Yang SL; Luo JP; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(6):1016-22. PubMed ID: 22613524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coronary lesions quantification with dual-axis rotational coronary angiography.
    Unzué Vallejo L; Delcán Domínguez JL; Alegría Barrero A; Medina Peralta J; Rodríguez Rodrigo FJ; Rodríguez-López JL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 23218798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.
    Gómez-Menchero AE; Díaz JF; Sánchez-González C; Cardenal R; Sanghvi AB; Roa-Garrido J; Rodríguez-López JL
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 May; 65(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 22465608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease progression.
    Berry C; L'Allier PL; Grégoire J; Lespérance J; Levesque S; Ibrahim R; Tardif JC
    Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(14):1851-7. PubMed ID: 17389269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality.
    Eloot L; Thierens H; Taeymans Y; Drieghe B; De Pooter J; Van Peteghem S; Buytaert D; Gijs T; Lapere R; Bacher K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):E205-12. PubMed ID: 25754018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery).
    Girasis C; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Colombo A; Holmes DR; Feldman TE; Bass EJ; Leadley K; Dawkins KD; Morice MC
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jan; 3(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 20129567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
    Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.