These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19180661)
1. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Garcia JA; Agostoni P; Green NE; Maddux JT; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Hansgen A; Wink O; Movassaghi B; Groves BM; Van Den Heuvel P; Verheye S; Van Langenhove G; Vermeersch P; Van den Branden F; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD; Carroll JD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 73(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 19180661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Klein AJ; Garcia JA; Hudson PA; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Wink O; Hattler B; Tsai TT; Chen SY; Hansgen A; Carroll JD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 20853352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Maddux JT; Wink O; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Liao R; Strzelczyk J; Chen SY; Carroll JD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jun; 62(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15170705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Contrast Volume, Radiation Dose, Fluoroscopy Time, and Procedure Time in Previously Published Studies of Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography. Loomba RS; Rios R; Buelow M; Eagam M; Aggarwal S; Arora RR Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 116(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 25983128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography. Jin ZG; Bai R; Li Y; Yang Y; Han W; Zhao Q; Zhang L; Liu HL Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31628576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Around the heart in 4 seconds. Tommaso CL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 73(6):762. PubMed ID: 19367632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Garcia JA; Chen SY; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Hansgen A; Wink O; Movassaghi B; Klein AJ; Carroll JD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 17295325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Akhtar M; Vakharia KT; Mishell J; Gera A; Ports TA; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Sep; 66(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16082684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized comparison between rotational and standard coronary angiography. Rigattieri S; Ghini AS; Silvestri P; Tommasino A; Ferraiuolo G; Palamara A; Loschiavo P Minerva Cardioangiol; 2005 Feb; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15788975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in. Liu HL; Jin ZG; Yang SL; Luo JP; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(6):1016-22. PubMed ID: 22613524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]