796 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19181227)
1. Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.
Chatterjee JS; Price PE
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 34(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19181227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery.
Kotsis SV; Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jan; 30(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15680560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.
Hwang PY; Ho CL
Neurosurgery; 2007 Feb; 60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. PubMed ID: 17297379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment.
Kotsis SV; Lau FH; Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 32(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 17218180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relative responsiveness and construct validity of the Spanish version of the DASH instrument for outcomes assessment in open carpal tunnel release.
Rosales RS; Diez de la Lastra I; McCabe S; Ortega Martinez JI; Hidalgo YM
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 19091735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes of carpal tunnel release in patients 65 and older.
Weber RA; Rude MJ
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jan; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 15680559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and PROMIS Instruments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Mahmood B; Chongshu C; Qiu X; Messing S; Hammert WC
J Hand Surg Am; 2019 May; 44(5):366-373. PubMed ID: 30581054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
Gay RE; Amadio PC; Johnson JC
J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 12671856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire--Dutch language version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
van der Giesen FJ; Nelissen RG; Arendzen JH; de Jong Z; Wolterbeek R; Vliet Vlieland TP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1121-6. PubMed ID: 18503809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures.
Amadio PC; Silverstein MD; Ilstrup DM; Schleck CD; Jensen LM
J Hand Surg Am; 1996 May; 21(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 8724457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness of the PROMIS and its Concurrent Validity with Other Region- and Condition-specific PROMs in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release.
Bernstein DN; Houck JR; Mahmood B; Hammert WC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2544-2551. PubMed ID: 31107341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Responsiveness of the Korean version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.
Wi SM; Gong HS; Bae KJ; Roh YH; Lee YH; Baek GH
Clin Orthop Surg; 2014 Jun; 6(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 24900903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-year follow-up of carpal tunnel release in patients over age 65.
Weber RA; DeSalvo DJ; Rude MJ
J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 35(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 20060236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-reported outcome after carpal tunnel release for advanced disease: a prospective and longitudinal assessment in patients older than age 70.
Leit ME; Weiser RW; Tomaino MM
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 May; 29(3):379-83. PubMed ID: 15140475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Atroshi I; Hofer M; Larsson GU; Ornstein E; Johnsson R; Ranstam J
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 34(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 19181226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire.
Roh YH; Yang BK; Noh JH; Baek GH; Song CH; Gong HS
J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 36(9):1497-503. PubMed ID: 21783329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using item response theory improved responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes measures in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Lyrén PE; Atroshi I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 22172153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes of surgical release among diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective follow-up with matched controls.
Thomsen NO; Cederlund R; Rosén I; Björk J; Dahlin LB
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Sep; 34(7):1177-87. PubMed ID: 19556077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and responsiveness of the patient evaluation measure as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Hobby JL; Watts C; Elliot D
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Aug; 30(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 15936130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of age and gender upon symptoms and surgical outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Hobby JL; Venkatesh R; Motkur P
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Dec; 30(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16143435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
