BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19181252)

  • 1. In vivo diode dosimetry for IMRT treatments generated by Pinnacle treatment planning system.
    Alaei P; Higgins PD; Gerbi BJ
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 19181252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric verification of RapidArc treatment delivery.
    Korreman S; Medin J; Kjaer-Kristoffersen F
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 18777411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry limitations and a dose correction methodology for step-and-shoot IMRT.
    Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Barnett RB
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):637-52. PubMed ID: 16424586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
    Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification.
    Bedford JL; Lee YK; Wai P; South CP; Warrington AP
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):N167-76. PubMed ID: 19384007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance.
    Létourneau D; Gulam M; Yan D; Oldham M; Wong JW
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Feb; 70(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 15028408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo dose verification of IMRT treated head and neck cancer patients.
    Engström PE; Haraldsson P; Landberg T; Sand Hansen H; Aage Engelholm S; Nyström H
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16165916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units.
    Aspradakis MM; Lambert GD; Steele A
    Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 16275566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
    Jones S; Williams M
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment planning system evaluation for mesothelioma IMRT.
    Stevens CW; Wong PF; Rice D; Jeter M; Forster K; Zhu XR
    Lung Cancer; 2005 Jul; 49 Suppl 1():S75-81. PubMed ID: 15950806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy of 172 patients treated for various disease sites: comparison of EBT film dosimetry, ion chamber measurements, and independent MU calculations.
    Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Pavlonnis G; Shumway R; Kaplan B; VanRooy E
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 18973859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replacing pretreatment verification with in vivo EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT.
    McDermott LN; Wendling M; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Apr; 67(5):1568-77. PubMed ID: 17394951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric validation of new semiconductor diode dosimetry system for intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Kinhikar R; Chaudhari S; Kadam S; Dhote D; Deshpande D
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2012; 8(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22531520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery.
    Bush K; Townson R; Zavgorodni S
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):N359-70. PubMed ID: 18758001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
    Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Palta JR; Liu C; Li JG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S108-12. PubMed ID: 18406906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment planning and delivery of IMRT using 6 and 18MV photon beams without flattening filter.
    Stathakis S; Esquivel C; Gutierrez A; Buckey CR; Papanikolaou N
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1629-37. PubMed ID: 19369083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
    Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.
    Zhu L; Lee L; Ma Y; Ye Y; Mazzeo R; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6653-72. PubMed ID: 18997262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of inhomogeneity corrections in intensity modulated radiation therapy planning in Philips Pinnacle system.
    Alaei P; Higgins PD
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 20627517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.